PDA

View Full Version : The Gaga Saga


SzczerbiakManiac
04-20-2011, 01:41 PM
I wouldn't classify myself as a Lady Gaga fan, but I would say some of her songs are enjoyable and I appreciate her support of us 'mos. I am most definitely a Weird Al fan and have been for 30 years, so that no doubt colors my reaction to this situation.

The Executive Summary
Al wanted to do a parody of Born This Way as the first single on his upcoming album. Even though he doesn't legally have to, he sent her the lyrics and asked for her permission. Gaga said she needed to literally hear the song before she could approve it. Al recorded the song. Gaga rejected it.

hear the song (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUxXKfQkswE)

Al's full blog post on the subject (http://alyankovic.wordpress.com/the-gaga-saga/) (spoiled due to length)I was really hoping that this blog entry would be all about me announcing the release date of my new album.

Sadly, it's not.

In a metaphorical nutshell, here's what happened.

I wrote and recorded what I thought was going to be the first single off of my new album: a parody of "Born This Way" by Lady Gaga called "Perform This Way." But after hearing it, Lady Gaga decided not to give me permission to release the song, so... it won't be coming out commercially anytime in the near future. Sorry.

Okay, now the long version.

I had written, recorded, mixed and mastered 11 of the 12 songs for my new album and was just waiting to come up with that one elusive "big idea" for a parody that I thought I could turn into the lead single and video. I was well aware that "Born This Way" was coming out, and I thought that just might be the pop culture juggernaut I had been waiting for... but after hearing the song, I was reluctant to tackle it. Because it was such an earnest human rights anthem, I thought some people might consider a parody to be in poor taste. Plus, I was really kinda predisposed not to do a Lady Gaga parody anyway because, well, that's what everybody in the universe was already assuming I would do, and I hate to be so predictable.

But a few weeks later, a parody idea popped into my head, and I thought it had a lot of potential – enough to warrant telling my record label that I'd finally found my next single. Based on my concept, I was reasonably sure that my parody wasn't really going to offend anybody... but I still decided, as an act of good karma, that I would donate all the money from sales of the song and music video to the Human Rights Campaign.

I was very excited now, because I knew that the second I got the official blessing from Lady Gaga, I could lock in an official release date for my album and announce it to the world. (My record company needs 8 weeks of advance notice to confirm an album release date – so in order to be as timely as possible, I almost always have to lock in the date before I've even started writing the lead single.)

I had my manager contact Lady Gaga's manager to see if she would okay the parody. Here was the exact pitch:

I'd like to do a parody of Lady Gaga's "Born This Way" called "I Perform This Way." The basic concept is that I, as a Lady Gaga doppelganger of sorts, describe the incredibly extravagant ways in which I perform on stage. Meat dresses and giant eggs would most likely be referenced, but also much more ridiculous made-up examples of bizarre wardrobe and stage production. As with all my parodies, it would be respectful of the artist, while having a bit of fun with her larger-than-life image.

I hadn't written a single line of the song at this point, but that was the concept I had in my head. Because of my 30-year track record, most artists know that my songs are all in good fun and they're more than happy to approve a parody just based on the concept alone.

We eventually got a response from the Gaga camp: she would need to "hear it" before she would approve it.

Okay, I thought, she wants to know exactly what the lyrics are going to be before she signs off on the parody. Some artists just are a bit more protective of their material and don't want to take any chances. Fair enough.

I was right in the middle of my Australian tour and I didn't have a whole lot of free time, but I cranked day and night until I had a set of finished lyrics.

We send the lyrics to Lady Gaga and wait on figurative pins and needles for her to give us the go-ahead. After a few days, we get our answer: "She actually needs to hear it. Otherwise the answer is no."

Hmm. Well, this was mystifying to me. At this point she has the lyrics... and hopefully she is familiar with her own song... and the parody is basically her music... with my lyrics. It really shouldn't be that hard to decide – based on having the lyrics right in front of you – whether or not you'd be "okay" with a parody. But, alas, we'd been given an ultimatum. If she didn't hear it, she wouldn't approve it.

Okay then. I decided – based on my belief that people are basically good – to go through the trouble and considerable expense of actually recording the song. Now, I never do that – never. But because I was really excited about this parody, I decided I would faithfully jump through as many hoops as Gaga deemed necessary.

After the Australian tour, I was supposed to go on a long-awaited family vacation over my daughter's spring break – but because I now had to record what ostensibly was going to be my "hit single" as quickly as humanly possible, I cut our vacation short and came back to L.A. to spend long days and nights in the studio. The band and I worked around the clock. On April 11, I put the finishing touches on the mix and mastered the track. Done.

Or so I thought.

A couple days later we got the final word: Lady Gaga says "no."

*silent scream*

And that's it. As of this posting, I still don't know specifically what kind of problem she has with the song (obviously I take a few jabs at her, but y'know, it's satire – that's how it's supposed to work). And I'm especially confused as to why she waited until I actually recorded the song (at her insistence!) before saying no. It's not like there were any surprises in the finished song that she couldn't have foreseen by, you know, READING THE LYRICS.

A conventional release for the song and video would have also raised a nice chunk of change for the HRC – an organization which I have to assume Gaga supports. Hopefully, if fans enjoy hearing the song online, they'll make a donation anyway.

My parodies have always fallen under what the courts call "fair use," and this one was no different, legally allowing me to record and release it without permission. But it has always been my personal policy to get the consent of the original artist before including my parodies on any album, so of course I will respect Gaga's wishes. However, given the circumstances, I have no problem with allowing people to hear it online, because I also have a personal policy not to completely waste my stinking time.

So I uploaded the song to YouTube, and will be making free mp3 downloads available on weirdal.com shortly. Hope you enjoy it.

Man, I wish you all could have had a chance to see the video we were going to do for this thing. It was going to be BEYOND AWESOME, and disturbing on many levels. Oh well.

Anyway, I realize that this may be way more information than many people would care to know about the whole situation, but I just wanted to set the record straight before any crazy rumors started. There's really nothing more that I have to say about it now, so hopefully I won't have to be answering questions about Lady Gaga in interviews for the next 20 years.

I know this news is disappointing to many of you. Believe me... nobody is more disappointed than I am.

Thanks for listening. I'll keep you posted.

Your pal,
AlEven if he wasn't donating the proceeds to the HRC (http://www.hrc.org/), I think she should get over herself and let him release the damn song. But since she holds herself up as a champion of the LGBT community, this is an especially egregious response on her part.

What do you think?

scaeagles
04-20-2011, 01:49 PM
I respect Weird Al for always getting permission and abiding by the wishes of the artist that is the subject of the parody. I respect artists that don't take themselves so seriously that they can't laugh at themselves.

Gaga does not have my respect, but that's no big deal, as she never has. Regardless of this song, she takes herself WAY to seriously.

Moonliner
04-20-2011, 02:02 PM
What do you think?

I think you are late to the party (http://www.loungeoftomorrow.com/LoT/showpost.php?p=345516&postcount=2259). :p

Oh and word is that it's a management snafu, Gaga herself loves Weird Al and has no problem with the song.

innerSpaceman
04-20-2011, 02:32 PM
I figured she'd do a 180 on this and claim it was a "management snafu." This makes her look like a pompous ass who can't take a joke. Bad PR move.


I guess it must irk if a song takes a few light-hearted pot-shots at you, but even more when the parody is MUCH BETTER than the actual song it spoofs.

Alex
04-20-2011, 03:32 PM
That said, why ask if the saying no isn't really an option (without it becoming a PR issue)? All you're really doing is inoculating yourself against the target of your satire later bitching about it, regardless of what they really think.

It is kind of like proposing on the jumbotron, you're just doing your best to ask a question such that the person is backed into a corner to provide the answer you want.

Morrigoon
04-20-2011, 04:04 PM
If she'd said no up front before he invested time and money and cut short his family vacation, then it would not have been this huge issue

Alex
04-20-2011, 04:35 PM
And if he wasn't willing to have her say no even after the work, he either should have stopped sooner or told her he'd be doing it regardless once he put that much work into it.

He is asking her for the favor. She is under no obligation to respond in the way he expects.

He gambled. He lost. That's not really her responsibility.

Gemini Cricket
04-20-2011, 04:54 PM
Lady Gaga OK's Al's parody (http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/in-switch-lady-gaga-will-allow-weird-al-parody-20110420)

SzczerbiakManiac
04-20-2011, 07:31 PM
Just to echo GC's Rolling Stone report, here's what Al himself has to say about the news on his blog (http://alyankovic.wordpress.com/2011/04/20/gaga-update/):Well, this was a strange day.

After putting my Lady Gaga parody on YouTube this morning—and announcing that it wouldn't be on my next album because Gaga didn’t approve it—there was a huge outpouring of disappointment from the Internet.

Apparently the fact that she didn't approve it was news to Lady Gaga herself!

Gaga's manager has now admitted that he never forwarded my parody to Gaga—she had no idea at all. Even though we assumed that Gaga herself was the one making the decision (because, well, that’s what we were TOLD), he apparently made the decision completely on his own.

He's sorry.

And Gaga loves the song.

I'm thrilled on many levels to hear this, because 1) I truly respect and admire Gaga as an artist and it pained me to think of her as having less than a great sense of humor, and 2) it means I GET TO PUT OUT MY ALBUM!

As promised, all my proceeds from the song (and the MUSIC VIDEO... I can't wait...) will go to the Human Rights Campaign.

Thank you, Gaga. And thanks to everybody who had my back.

Whew!

Your pal,
Al

innerSpaceman
04-21-2011, 07:41 AM
I'm not buying it - - - but assuming arguendo that version of the turnaround is true, I think it validates Weird Al's "strategy" in the age of handlers (whereas otherwise Alex obviously has the more valid point).

BarTopDancer
04-21-2011, 08:17 AM
goddamnsongisstuckinmyhead

cirquelover
04-21-2011, 09:29 AM
The boy was following this saga yesterday too.

From the article I read it said Al didn't actually need her permission to publish it as parody is protected/allowed in the court system without cconsent. I think Al just prefers to get the artists permission first.

Kevy Baby
04-21-2011, 09:56 AM
From the article I read it said Al didn't actually need her permission to publish it as parody is protected/allowed in the court system without cconsent. I think Al just prefers to get the artists permission first.That is correct - Al has ALWAYS securred the artist permissions before including the song parodies on his albums. From the FAQ page of Al's site:
Does Al get permission to do his parodies?

Al does get permission from the original writers of the songs that he parodies. While the law supports his ability to parody without permission, he feels it's important to maintain the relationships that he's built with artists and writers over the years. Plus, Al wants to make sure that he gets his songwriter credit (as writer of new lyrics) as well as his rightful share of the royalties.

alphabassettgrrl
04-21-2011, 10:54 AM
I think it's great that he gets permission from the people he parodies. As noted, not necessary, but certainly in good form. When he performed at the theater where I work, he was a very respectful person and I greatly increased my admiration of Al.

Not Afraid
04-21-2011, 11:13 AM
I couldn't pic Gaga from a police line up, but I can't hear her name without thinking of Christopher Walkin.

innerSpaceman
04-21-2011, 11:47 AM
It should also be noted that this is the FIRST time Weird Al has actually critiqued (however mildly in this case) the artist whose song he parodies.

One Nirvana song parody referenced the generic grunge scene the band was part of, but this is the only time anything remotely this specific has been contained in the lyrics. It's probably why I like this spoof more than most of his other stuff ... but it's also why this might have had more of a sting with Lady Gaga than with any previous artist parodied by Weird Al.