View Full Version : After 244 Years, Encyclopędia Britannica Stops the Presses
Kevy Baby
03-13-2012, 10:55 PM
After 244 years, the Encyclopaedia Britannica is going out of print.
Those coolly authoritative, gold-lettered reference books that were once sold door-to-door by a fleet of traveling salesmen and displayed as proud fixtures in American homes will be discontinued, company executives said.Link (http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/13/after-244-years-encyclopaedia-britannica-stops-the-presses/?src=tp)
flippyshark
03-14-2012, 06:55 AM
Well, now I want one.
I think this sentence is all that needs to be printed to explain the entire situation:
. The last print version is the 32-volume 2010 edition, which weighs 129 pounds and includes new entries on global warming and the Human Genome Project.
Moonliner
03-14-2012, 08:23 AM
I am proud to have been one among the "fleet of traveling salesmen" selling Encyclopedia.
It inspired me to get my butt to college.
katiesue
03-14-2012, 09:02 AM
I kind of liked randomly looking up things, then finding something else along the way.
Plus, it peaked with the 1911 edition when it had the perfect blend of comprehensiveness and casual genteel racism.
Moonliner
03-14-2012, 09:44 AM
I kind of liked randomly looking up things, then finding something else along the way.
I do that with Wikipedia all the time. I'm on the site looking up info on something like a solar filament (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_filament)and the next thing I know, I'm reading about The Texas Rollergirls (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Rollergirls) and two hours have disappeared.
As an aside, once I get Headliner off to college, I hope to use Wikitravel (http://wikitravel.org/en/Main_Page) to plan trips. Hit the sites "Random page" button and go wherever it takes me. Today's destination would have been: Retezat National Park (http://wikitravel.org/en/Retezat_National_Park)
alphabassettgrrl
03-14-2012, 04:12 PM
I kind of liked randomly looking up things, then finding something else along the way.
Oh, I loved doing that, too!
I do that with Wikipedia all the time.
Really? I don't find the digital version to be as amenable to random finds. I look for something, and find it, and that's that.
Sad to lose such a staple of my childhood.
Try the "Random page" link at wikipedia. You'll learn more soccer and cricket players than you'd ever believe existed.
Ghoulish Delight
03-14-2012, 05:14 PM
I hit an NFL player at 31 clicks. Click 33 got me a soccer club. Belgian Pro League at 40. Finally hit a Japanese player at 42.
Kevy Baby
03-14-2012, 06:18 PM
In 1928 English cricketer Robert Lyttelton claimed that drawn matches, due in part to blocking the wicket with the legs, were the "curse of modern cricket"!
Kevy Baby
03-14-2012, 06:21 PM
Holy carp: did you know that Wikipedia has a List of airports in Poland with unpaved runways (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_airports_in_Poland_with_unpaved_runways)?
And on only my third click!
CoasterMatt
03-14-2012, 06:55 PM
Kevy: I only knew about that because of film location work that I got to help with a couple months ago.
12 Clicks: Sampsa Timoska (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampsa_Timoska), Finnish footballer (and it was the third sports related result).
RStar
03-15-2012, 07:20 AM
I hit an NFL player at 31 clicks. Click 33 got me a soccer club. Belgian Pro League at 40. Finally hit a Japanese player at 42.
Wow, are they okay? You didn't send any of them to the hospital, did you? Dang, I better be nice next time I see you, you're one tough dude! :D
Cadaverous Pallor
03-15-2012, 07:41 AM
Back in 2001 or so I was taking Library Science classes and learning the finer points of old school reference work, using seriously thick tomes to look up simple things like what films Marilyn Monroe was in, then having to switch to different volumes to follow the career of any of her costars, and using entirely different books to look up detail on the films themselves...I was already used to digital card catalog programs and imdb and was rather surprised at how complicated it all was. The second realization is that I was studying a nearly dead science, and that it wouldn't be long before it crumbled away.
It is a shame in many respects, but it's only because of the amazing availability of information, and that's an overwhelmingly positive thing.
Moonliner
03-15-2012, 09:42 AM
1. Science Fiction novel. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mariner_Project)
2. Indian actress (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padmini_%28actress%29)
3. Serbian radio top 100 songs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B92_Top_100_Domestic_Songs)
4. One of three counties in the United States (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_County)
5. Commune in eastern France (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotonnes)
6. A town in India (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chintamani,_Karnataka)
7. A Boyz II Men song (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thank_You_%28Boyz_II_Men_song%29)
8. A town in Nova Scotia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pleasant,_Nova_Scotia)(possibly)
9. A Dutch Golden Age still life painter (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornelis_Jacobsz_Delff) (I thought that might be a winner)
10. A Japanese actress (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aya_Sugimoto)
11. Protestants in Tanzania (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestants_in_Tanzania)
12. A United States passenger rail network (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Service) (not amtrack!)
13. A 1999 magnitude 7.1 earthquake (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Hector_Mine_earthquake)
14. A Canadian ice hockey player. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Brooker_%28ice_hockey%29) (Ooh so close!)
15. A Christian religious awakening (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Great_Awakening)
16. Singapore's best known drag queen. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kumar_%28drag_queen%29)
17. The number 868 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/868_%28disambiguation%29) (disambiguation)
18. A 12th century learned clergyman from Liège (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alger_of_Li%C3%A8ge)
19. A French financier and politician (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achille_Fould)
20. All-time General Managers of the Chicago Blackhawks (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chicago_Blackhawks_general_managers) (Grrrr.. More Hockey)
21. Incidents of political violence in Washington, D.C. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_political_violence_in_Washing ton,_D.C.)
22. Species of frog from Cameroon. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arlequinus_krebsi)
*whew* Time for a lunch break, back in a bit....
OK, I had a nice chicken sub at Quiznos and now we continue....
23. An administrative district of Gmina Kościerzyna (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lizaki)
24. A town in the Canadian province of Newfoundland (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biscay_Bay,_Newfoundland_and_Labrador)
25. A radio station in Ili'ili, American Samoa (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KULA-LP) (Perhaps they broadcast soccer games...)
26. A 1922 silent film (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Experiment_%281922_film%29)
27. A Centre for Music and Performing Arts (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre_for_Music_and_Performing_Arts)
28. An American documentary film director (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_Pray) (Again, damn. I thought I had it)
29. A festival in Tamilnadu (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karaga_%28festival%29)
30. A village in Spain (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albu%C3%B1uelas) (I suppose some soccer players might live here)
31. Top Rock'n'Roll Hits: 1959 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billboard_Top_Rock%27n%27Roll_Hits:_1959)
32. A Canadian doctrine of constitutional interpretation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_tree_doctrine) (Trending back towards Ice Hockey)
33. Latin Grammy Awards (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_Grammy_Awards_of_2000)
34. Studio album by Swedish band Club 8. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strangely_Beautiful)
35. Giovane Alves da Silva (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovane_Alves_da_Silva) Winner!!!!
I'll bet you clicked on at least one of those links. Which one was it?
Strangler Lewis
03-15-2012, 09:49 AM
Back in 2001 or so I was taking Library Science classes and learning the finer points of old school reference work, using seriously thick tomes to look up simple things like what films Marilyn Monroe was in, then having to switch to different volumes to follow the career of any of her costars, and using entirely different books to look up detail on the films themselves...I was already used to digital card catalog programs and imdb and was rather surprised at how complicated it all was. The second realization is that I was studying a nearly dead science, and that it wouldn't be long before it crumbled away.
It is a shame in many respects, but it's only because of the amazing availability of information, and that's an overwhelmingly positive thing.
Well, sure, if you're only interested in results, but you can't beat the archeological thrill of immersion in the Reader's Guide to Periodical Literature and various microfiches and microfilms.
Back in 2001 or so I was taking Library Science classes and learning the finer points of old school reference work, using seriously thick tomes to look up simple things like what films Marilyn Monroe was in, then having to switch to different volumes to follow the career of any of her costars, and using entirely different books to look up detail on the films themselves...
That's too bad, when I was in library school ('96-'98) we did learn that stuff, to a degree, but mostly it was all about the wonderful new world of data availability ("compare and contrast this weird new thing called "google" with DIALOG" was a paper I had to write).
As I've said, it was becoming a librarian that made me indifferent to the book. I was just interested in how best to store, structure, and retrieve information.
lashbear
03-15-2012, 03:36 PM
I'll bet you clicked on at least one of those links. Which one was it?
Like you had to ask..... (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kumar_%28drag_queen%29) :rolleyes:
BarTopDancer
03-15-2012, 10:20 PM
My parents still have the Funk & Wagnalls (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funk_%26_Wagnalls) encyclopedias I used to write my elementary school research papers.
Cadaverous Pallor
03-16-2012, 01:34 PM
That's too bad, when I was in library school ('96-'98) we did learn that stuff, to a degree, but mostly it was all about the wonderful new world of data availability ("compare and contrast this weird new thing called "google" with DIALOG" was a paper I had to write).We also got only a cursory lesson in that with one quick research project using the dusty books. They wanted to us to know how they walked uphill in the snow both ways back in the day, and understand the roots for the electronic databases they subscribed to at the time (most of which is being washed away by the free public offerings on the internet today).
My card catalog class was much more intensive. The instructor was an old German librarian who looked like Doc Brown and was absolutely distraught at the loss of the fine art of typing cards. We spent what seemed like an endless amount of time cracking the code of tabbing and spacing and all-caps and parenthesis, only some of which still applied to online cataloging. We used Dewey reference works and created our own subject descriptions even as I was working at a school library and ordering automated processing on all of our book purchases because it was dirt cheap. I know someone has to sit in a cubicle and do the data entry but now that is one person is employed the publisher itself, not even the middle-man school library sales company or any sort of district librarian, never mind the librarians that actually work at the library. Of course special collections and older acquisitions require that kind of know how, but in most scenarios these days the easy-peasy software walks you through it.
My parents still have encyclopedias from my dad's youth, circa 1960. They are good for a fun night of dramatic readings of science entries.
They also have the ones I used for reports, which were bought from a yard sale and are as old as I am. They were still perfectly useful for most (non-science) homework, at least then.
Snowflake
03-16-2012, 02:54 PM
I'll bet you clicked on at least one of those links. Which one was it?
Snort! (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Experiment_%281922_film%29)
Like that's not totally predictable and obvious. :D
CoasterMatt
03-16-2012, 03:03 PM
I can't raise the level of my workbench with a wiki search, though...
Snowflake
03-16-2012, 03:12 PM
I remember the F&W salesman coming to our house with a heavy case full of books and my parents buying them. Then the volumes arriving and then subsequent updated appendix volumes every year until I got out of high school.
Moonliner
03-16-2012, 08:31 PM
Snort! (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Experiment_%281922_film%29)
Like that's not totally predictable and obvious. :D
Yup, but I don't think he was in that one.
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.