Log in

View Full Version : YES We did!


Pages : 1 [2]

Alex
01-26-2009, 10:58 AM
Yes, now I'm at my desk playing with my work scissors. I use them once a year or so as scissors -- the rest of the time they are essentially a box cutter for opening packages -- so their right-handedness is something I can cope with. I had just never tried but they do cut reasonably well when used upside-down and left handed.

When the eco-Nazis come knocking down my door over the many post-its I've just wasted I will be sending them to your house next (and while there they may collect your extra shoes).

Betty
01-26-2009, 10:59 AM
Just say NO to bad scissors and other crappy office supplies.

Life is to short to write with crappy pens.

This.

I buy my own pens for work and I very occasionally will give them out to coworkers I really like. You know - the first one's free. heh heh. They come back for more... and hey... maybe I should be dealing pens to co-workers for some extra cash. :D

I like the bold roller ball ones. The fine micro point ones are just meh.

Kevy Baby
01-26-2009, 12:01 PM
Wow - from the thrill of a new President to impassioned discussion of scissors in one mind-sizzling thread.YES We did!

Ghoulish Delight
01-26-2009, 12:09 PM
As I suspected, the "no earmarks" stipulation on the new stimulus package is turning out to be a purely symbolic move. I've already read articles about how it's just shifted where the favors are done.

Perhaps it is just the beginning, and if Obama keeps it up, maybe there will be fewer and fewer dark corners for the greedy to scurry into when the light is show. But I'm not holding my breath.

I'm still not convinced earmarking is as evil as everyone makes it out to be. Even vocal anti-earmarkers have said, "At least if there are earmarks in the stimulus package we know where the money's going."

Whether it happens in the bill itself or down the line, money is going to be given to people asking for it. The issue isn't earmarks, the issue is questionable favor-doing. Getting rid of earmarks doesn't solve that problem, it just delays it until a later date.

Alex
01-26-2009, 12:17 PM
Matt Taibbi, in his book The Great Derangement has a chapter that pretty effectively put to lie any claims about doing away with earmarks or significantly regulating them.

He pretty effectively shows examples of unlabeled earmarks sitting in plain sight but completely indistinguishable and therefore pretty much impossible to do anything about.

Not Afraid
01-26-2009, 01:59 PM
I'm home, sick, and probably a little delusional at the moment. But I wonder if it has anything to do with where the axle is.

I didn't read what you quoted and was wondering what an xle location had to do with being sick. Maybe I'm the one who is delusional.

Ghoulish Delight
01-29-2009, 09:07 AM
I'm sure it will become a part of the party culture war.

Reagan, Bush Sr., and Bush Jr., all required jackets at all times. Clinton and Obama don't (though is Obama allowing other people to be sans jacket?).
Answer:

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/090129-obama-casual-hlrg-345a.grid-6x3.jpg

SacTown Chronic
01-29-2009, 09:43 AM
^"Seriously, guys, her ass was like two basketballs fused together."

BarTopDancer
01-29-2009, 05:58 PM
The press here made a big deal about that second photo.

Obama is not wearing a coat. Bush mandated coats be worn at all times in the oval office.

I'm sure it will become a part of the party culture war.

Reagan, Bush Sr., and Bush Jr., all required jackets at all times. Clinton and Obama don't (though is Obama allowing other people to be sans jacket?).

Republicans: Want to look important
Democrats: Want to do important things

Here (http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.parstimes.com/history/carter_oval_office.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php%3Faz%3Dview_all%26address%3D389x488681 3&usg=__ifdTfB7VWQPIPqLRL8_z3OeWIP4=&h=290&w=392&sz=67&hl=en&start=3&tbnid=gP41s33xzhAHrM:&tbnh=91&tbnw=123&prev=/images%3Fq%3Doval%2Boffice%2Bno%2Bsuit%2Bjacket%26 hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1T4GFRC_enUS208US208) is a good link to the history of jackets in the Oval Office. It started as a campaign tactic by Regan against Carter.

Snowflake
01-30-2009, 12:24 PM
From a friend of a friend on Facebook

Michelle Obama is the first FLILF

Ghoulish Delight
01-30-2009, 12:29 PM
No love for Ms. Bouvier Kennedy Onassis?

Snowflake
01-30-2009, 12:31 PM
No love for Ms. Bouvier Kennedy Onassis?

Not unless your a necrophiliac.

SacTown Chronic
01-30-2009, 12:32 PM
Or Babs Bush?

Strangler Lewis
01-30-2009, 12:33 PM
Dolly Madison sounds pretty hot. And there's always Eleanor and the girls.

Alex
01-30-2009, 12:35 PM
I was thinking that the honor would go to Abigail Adams. And if not her then Frances Cleveland.

Moonliner
01-30-2009, 12:36 PM
Mary Todd was kinda hot in a sightly offbeat sorta way.

bewitched
01-30-2009, 09:49 PM
Mary Todd was kinda hot in a sightly offbeat sorta way.


If by "offbeat" you mean "whack job".

Alex
01-31-2009, 09:09 AM
Unfortunately paintings are hard to use for judgment (so Dolley and Abigail are difficult to know), but I'm serious about Frances Cleveland being a candidate:


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/41/Frances_Folsom_Cleveland.jpg