Log in

View Full Version : What You Value


Tref
04-16-2009, 03:15 PM
According to the website Stimator (http://www.stimator.com/). The value of our beloved Lounge of Tomorrow is ...

Wait!

Take a wild guess first ...

Ready?

Ok, but first write your estimate on your forehead so it can be read in the bathroom mirror.

$72.
Is that the number written on your forehead?

To find the value of other web sites, see previous link.

Chernabog
04-16-2009, 03:24 PM
FIRST!!!!

Tref
04-16-2009, 03:31 PM
First!

Oh wait, damn!

Ghoulish Delight
04-16-2009, 03:33 PM
Well now, that's quite the plummet.

Back in '06 we were worth $2,441 (http://www.loungeoftomorrow.com/LoT/showthread.php?t=4574).

But wait, that's was a different site making that estimation. 2 1/2 years on, according to said same site, we are wort.....


$8,648.

More than triple the value in less than 3 years. Should have been selling stock!

Moonliner
04-16-2009, 03:36 PM
The site Tref cited must have somehow missed indexing the bacon thread. That would account for the difference in price.

Ghoulish Delight
04-16-2009, 03:41 PM
Stimator values my and CP's personal domain at $3 higher than the LoT. One's got almost nothing on it and no visitors. The other has an active message board and a continual stream of visitors. I think I question Stimator's algorithms.

Strangler Lewis
04-16-2009, 04:38 PM
FIRST!!!!!!!!

FIRST!!!!

I assume these are meant to be tongue in cheek, but this sh*t is the message board equivalent of nails on a chalkboard.

Moonliner
04-16-2009, 04:57 PM
Stimator values my and CP's personal domain at $3 higher than the LoT. One's got almost nothing on it and no visitors. The other has an active message board and a continual stream of visitors. I think I question Stimator's algorithms.

You two are cheating on us? Running around with other posters behind our backs? I'm shocked I tell you shocked!

Ghoulish Delight
04-16-2009, 05:39 PM
It's nothing more than a domain that houses our travel photos. And it doesn't even do that anymore now that I've paid for Flickr.

Moonliner
04-16-2009, 05:49 PM
It's nothing more than a domain that houses our travel photos. And it doesn't even do that anymore now that I've paid for Flickr.

PICTURES!!! Kinky. And you paid for it? :eek:

Deebs
04-16-2009, 06:17 PM
The title and placement of this thread led me to believe briefly that its subject matter might be soulful.

SacTown Chronic
04-16-2009, 06:33 PM
I know! I was about to post about my 1984 Topps baseball card set. That set had the Mark McGwire rookie card (1984 USA Baseball team) that was worth $400 at it's peak. Then dude was exposed, wouldn't answer Congress' questions and now the card is probably worth $40 if I'm lucky.

But the set is awesome! All my favorite players and more Hall of Famers than you could shake a stick at. Of course mine isn't in mint condition because I, you know, actually handled them. A lot.


Oh, and then I might have said a few words about my wife and children. You know, so as to not look like a jerk. Had this thread been of the soulful variety.

Tref
04-17-2009, 12:08 AM
The title and placement of this thread led me to believe briefly that its subject matter might be soulful.

On the contrary, the intrinsic value of something is not found in its so-called monetary worth or its marketability to the general public but in the people who sign onto it every day and breathe life into its pages. People like you and me, and that guy and some other people. But probably mostly that guy. These 'regular' folk are the true heart of LoT. They are its worth. How you say, its 'soulful' element. A man or a woman (or a half man/half woman) can open a thousand threads and never find what they seek, because the reality of it is, what they seek is within themselves. And if it is not within themselves, it is probably close by, perhaps, in a jar. So, it begs the question, what exactly do they seek and why is it in a jar? We will probably never know.

The Betty Crocker Cook's Dictionary defines soul, thusly, (noun) A European flatfish, Solea solea, used for food. Often eaten with cake. See, fish, Filet of.

Those words should give us all pause. Not for what is possibly an embarrassing contextual misinterpretation of the word, soul, but for what it doesn't say, and that is, I must invest in a real dictionary.

I am reminded of a joke about a man who goes into a bakery and requests a cookie made in the shape of the letter, ‘e’. He returns the next day but he is disappointed to see that the letter ‘e’ has been done as a capital ‘e’, as such -- E. The man is outraged and orders the baker to prepare him a new one as the cookie, in its present state, is simply not acceptable. The next day the man returns and the baker shows him the new cookie. It has been done to the man's specifications and the man is delighted. The relieved baker asks him if he would like the cookie wrapped up. “No,” the man says. “I will eat it here.” And he did.

I hope that clears some things up.

Tref
04-17-2009, 12:09 AM
FIRST!

Ghoulish Delight
04-17-2009, 12:23 AM
n00b