I swear she said something after Jack said "watching what" but it was mumbled and then Jack went off with "you have to be kidding me blah blah blah"

^I just got thru watching that scene over and over again(even in close caption, just in case).

Right after Jack says "watching what" she pauses; maybe to think of an answer that Jack will understand or maybe because she is perplexed that Jack didn't know...but the only thing she says is "yes honey" to the little girl.

Regarding the kids watching the trial: I watched this scene over again a couple of times. All the people in the room sitting down look to be about the same height...they could be kids but then it would only be kids and no adults. Julliet does appear to be much taller than all those seated so maybe they are kids or maybe she is up on a dias of some sort.

Also: After watching this episode pretty much all over again it seems to me that Isebella has similar mannerisms to an android. Could just be her personality but one has to wonder if maybe she is the monster. The French lady once called the monster a "security system" and Tom called Isebella a "sheriff"......?

Eh, I'd just toss that into my absolute hatred for Juliet's character/actress. Seems that with both of them they don't want to give anything away so they're told to NOT ACT at all. :rolleyes: I am so sick of Juliet. They keep cutting to her face for a reaction and her face never changes. She always has that dumb non-committal not-really-a-smile smirk on her face. "Am I sad at this outcome? Am I happy? Am I sad or happy but trying to hide it? You don't know!!!" :mad: It's so stupid. I hope this whole show doesn't devolve into that "you guess my emotion" BS. As if there isn't enough that's hidden. :rolleyes: :mad: :rolleyes:

</rant>

Another thing that bothers me about that scene...kids or not why did no one who was facing Julliet look back over their shoulders to see what the commotion was all about. Seems to me that if one is in a closed door meeting and someone knocks on the door and a loud argument then ensues at least a few heads would turn....not one did:confused:

Rant uderstood...so much of this show seems to be having the actors act coy for coys sake and nothing more. It's like the old days of the Soviet Union where all of their diplomats were instructed to act like they might be spying in order to help hide those who really were.

Tonight is another episode of Lost.....can't be any worse than last weeks:)

It annoys me that they are toating it as a "must see" episode. So far every "must see" episode has been a complete let down.

I did see Jinn and Sun in the previews, so maybe we will get back to them.

I know..."must see" is the kiss of death usually.

If they get back to Jinn and Sun then it stands to reason we'll get to see Sayid too. I hope so as his character tends to act a bit more logical then Jack, Sawyer, Locke, and Kate.

The writers indicated their displeasure about the promotions department on the official podcast. I would be pissed too. It only makes people annoyed.

The episode isn't even over yet, but this is exactly what this season needed - a great Hurley episode.

The scene with Sawyer teaching Jinn English was just priceless, and Hurley was great. What a hysterical episode....while I haven't been as annoyed as most with the last few episodes, this was just was was needed.

No questions answered but a boat(or vw bus) full of new ones:

1) Was that a map Sawyer had in his hands?
2) How is there still air in the tires?
3) What killed Roger WorkMan in the first place?
4) Where are they going to get gas once that miraculously still-full tank runs out?
5) Cars on an Island? Since we have never seen anyone actually circle the "Island" yet how are we sure this even is an Island?

I liked this episode(any episode that isn't Jack centered is better than those that are) ok, but I would like even more to have at least a few questions answered for a change.

Also:

Did the writers just pull a fast one on us? Is this their way of getting away from having to figure out a way to explain the numbers?

If so then what other big mysteries will be "answered" with similar brush offs?