OMG I loved the use of that song too!

Here's a question... Why didn't Pierre Chang look any older than he did in 1977?

Yeah, I went ahead and assumed he meant without aid of backhoes or steam shovels.

Oh duh! I was so busy being proud of myself for recognizing his voice before they showed him that I didn't even blink at his lack of aging.

Hmph, this was one of those non-Brad episodes of Lost. Ho hum. ;) :D

Maybe Chang looked young for the same reason Boone looked old.

I don't think they're going to any effort to change the look of the characters with aging or de-aging make up effects. Too bad. I'm sure they've got the budget. Kind of a dufus neglect with entire seasons about time travel and alternate realities.



How old did Brad look last week? It was so blurry, I couldn't tell. They did give him that beardlette, which I think made him look a little older.

Boone looked a couple years older than he should have. Chang looked 33 years younger than he should have. That's a pretty big difference and one that can't particularly be chalked up to lazy makeup decisions. I would be shocked if there isn't a reason for it.

I hope I'm wrong, but I think a lot of people are going to be disappointed there's no reason for ring finger continuity or age-inappropriate appearances. I point those out only because I don't have a memory suited to the intricacies of previous seasons ... but the idea that they can have an explanation for every perceived clue or portentious item seen during six years of episodes sometime during the remaining half dozen episodes seems a little far-fetched.

The ring...maybe (though I'd be surprised if that was just an oversight). Failing to age someone 33 years as an oversight, especially in light of Richardocus' story, would be shocking.

Yeah, I gotta agree. At least, I hope they weren't that lazy and, sure, I'd be very surprised if they were.

Maybe I just don't want another But What Does It MEAN???

I like those, but um, it's time to start wrapping those up, not adding more. :D