Lawrence v. Texas would be the most direct precedent. Beyond saying that there was no rational basis for criminalizing gay sex, the majority spoke at some length about the personal nature of the decision of whom to love. It would seem odd to say that the personal decision of whom to love is only respected to the extent that you can't be thrown in jail for it but that it does not extend to the stabilizing institution of marriage.

Choir members gotta show up on Sunday if anyone's going to hear them sing.

SL! That was the other court case I was trying to think of, you darling you! :)

1. Lies.
2. Threats:
Source

My opinion of AT&T, Comcast, Time Warner, Abbott and Associates, and California Association of Club Executives has gone up.

I am just stunned. I have no words. I WILL spreads this around to everyone, regardless of who I might piss off.

I can guess why, but por que?

Never mind, I missed one page of the PDF.

There's a PDF of the letter Abbott received, as well as a copy of the list of contributors to Equality Califonia (above).

It's an interesting issue, but that could be extortion. He should send the letter to the San Diego D.A. and, when they refuse to look into it, Jerry Brown. He should also, of course, say, fine, publish away.

What I really wish I could do is picket the Yes on H8 offices. But then I would have to go to Sacramento and that just isn't worth it.

The Yes on 8 people are up and down OSO pkwy and Alicia.