Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   NFL '09 (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=9823)

scaeagles 03-31-2010 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 319107)
That would be ideal in my opinion but I can understand why the players wouldn't like it at all. Maybe one period but unless sudden kicked in after that there'd be the prospect of six, seven, eight quarter games and that is a lot of abuse.


During the regular season even sudden death results in a tie if no one scores. Doesn't happen often, but it would mean at most one extra quarter. In the playoffs they would just need to suck it up - it's the playoffs.

Ghoulish Delight 03-31-2010 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles (Post 319115)
During the regular season even sudden death results in a tie if no one scores. Doesn't happen often, but it would mean at most one extra quarter. In the playoffs they would just need to suck it up - it's the playoffs.

In that case I see VERY conservative OT periods, with a high likelihood of ending with no scoring, teams preferring to play field position and avoid losing rather than play for the win.

I sill like the NCAA solution.

Alex 03-31-2010 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles (Post 319115)
During the regular season even sudden death results in a tie if no one scores. Doesn't happen often, but it would mean at most one extra quarter. In the playoffs they would just need to suck it up - it's the playoffs.

For the regular season I'm mostly ok with the current system. No, it isn't great but it doesn't matter all that much either.

For the post season I would not relish the idea of coming off a 7-quarter victory to face the Colts after they've enjoyed their opening round bye. As a viewer I'd be ok with it if that were the way it got set up but I can understand why players and coaches would be strongly opposed.

Strangler Lewis 03-31-2010 09:26 AM

While we're fixing football, I say it's time to get rid of timeouts. With everybody miked up, there should be nothing to talk about. I shouldn't have to watch an extra five minutes of mancave commercials because the quarterback couldn't get the snap off or didn't like the defensive formation. If you don't like the defensive formation, deal with it or take a delay of game to talk about it.

As for the two minute drill, it might become the four minute drill, but that would be okay. If you aren't ahead by the end of the game, you don't deserve to have things made easier.

Same thing for basketball. If the other team is running you ragged, tough. There are no timeouts in boxing. It goes without saying that the last two minutes of most basketball games are virtually unwatchable.

Kevy Baby 03-31-2010 09:50 AM

I know it wouldn't fly, but how about making the football sudden death say that a touchdown must be scored to win the game?

And while we are fixing sports, let's make golf a full-contact sport!

Alex 03-31-2010 09:54 AM

The newly announced change is close to that. You can only win on the first possession of overtime if you score a touchdown. If you kick a fieldgoal the other team gets a shot and a field goal will continue overtime, a touchdown wins it, and a failure to score ends it.

Strangler Lewis 03-31-2010 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 319124)
I know it wouldn't fly, but how about making the football sudden death say that a touchdown must be scored to win the game?

And while we are fixing sports, let's make golf a full-contact sport!

GET IN THE HOLE!!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.