Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Daily Grind (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   The random political thoughts thread (Part Deux) (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=3249)

sleepyjeff 10-16-2006 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wendybeth
Ken Starr investigation costs: $40,000,000. (approx)

Fitzgerald investigation costs: $1,500,000 (approx)

Just goes to show how much Democrats overspend.

;)

innerSpaceman 10-16-2006 10:36 PM

Does your hair get all gritty from that sand you constantly have your head in, Neph?

Nephythys 10-17-2006 06:40 AM

I dunno- do you get good TV reception with all the tinfoil?

scaeagles 10-17-2006 06:44 AM

Hey sleepy - it's just because there is more corruption on the left so it costs more to investigate.;)

Nephythys 10-17-2006 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles
Hey sleepy - it's just because there is more corruption on the left so it costs more to investigate.;)

heehee :D

scaeagles 10-17-2006 07:03 AM

Random thoughts.....

Harry Reid is going to amend his Senate ethics reports for full disclosure because "Republicans believe in cover-ups, but (he) believes in facts coming to light."

Bwahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

September averaged .7 degrees lower than normal temps. Somehow I'm sure this will be spun as evidence of man caused global warming.

Mars is showing signs of tremendous climate change. It look as if our man caused global warming is having a much more far reaching effect than I had thought possible.

Nephythys 10-17-2006 07:24 AM

Link

Quote:

Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid has been using campaign donations instead of his personal money to pay Christmas bonuses for the support staff at the Ritz-Carlton where he lives in an upscale condominium. Federal election law bars candidates from converting political donations for personal use.

innerSpaceman 10-17-2006 07:47 AM

So, where's the blindness here? It seems EVERY lib on this board is perfectly willing to assume the worst about nearly every Democratic politician and political operative, but the conservatives here are so defensive about the Republican pols and operatives.

It does you no good to nah-nah-nah about Reid or Pelosi or back to Clinton if you'd like ... yeah, we won't bother defending them much. They are pols, and all of them crooked as a dog's hind leg.

It's you ostriches insisting "your" side's all squeaky clean that's laughable.

Nephythys 10-17-2006 07:54 AM

None of us have ever claimed to have a squeaky clean side- but nor are we going to roll over and capitulate to the hysteria that says republicans/conservatives etc are evil incarnate.

JWBear 10-17-2006 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nephythys
None of us have ever claimed to have a squeaky clean side- but nor are we going to roll over and capitulate to the hysteria that says republicans/conservatives etc are evil incarnate.

But do Republicans not claim to be the party of traditional values and morality? Nothing reeks more of hypocrisy than claiming the moral high ground in public, but being very immoral in private. Republicans tried to crucify Clinton because he lied about his sex life. Yet they defend Foley and those who covered up for him. Can you not see the double standard?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.