Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Daily Grind (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   All About McCain (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=8362)

Morrigoon 08-29-2008 08:30 AM

Well, here's a lil' scandal
Quote:

Under investigation for firing
But Palin’s seemingly bright future was clouded in late July when the state legislature voted to hire an independent investigator to find out whether she tried to have a state official fire her ex-brother-in-law from his job as a state trooper.

The allegation was made by former Department of Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan, whom Palin fired in mid-July.

Morrigoon 08-29-2008 08:33 AM

Whoa, hold on a sec... he's running with a woman who named her kids Track and Trig? Dare we ask what the other three are called?

scaeagles 08-29-2008 08:37 AM

I would figure Obama would like the entire "lack of experience" issue to go away at all levels. However, it would certainly seem to have an affect on McCain using Obama's inexperience in the campaign. I could see a spin (definitely spin) that there's a difference between inexperience as VP and inexperience as President.

scaeagles 08-29-2008 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 235935)
Whoa, hold on a sec... he's running with a woman who named her kids Track and Trig? Dare we ask what the other three are called?

Football, Geometry, and Shop.

3894 08-29-2008 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles (Post 235924)
Perhaps to some women breaking through to a new level is the highest priority in terms of what they are interested in.

I thought conservatives were against Affirmative Action. But if McCain wanted a woman veep, there just aren't that many truly qualified choices in the Republican Party.

Gemini Cricket 08-29-2008 08:40 AM

He picked Sarah Palin. Interesting.

scaeagles 08-29-2008 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3894 (Post 235939)
I thought conservatives were against Affirmative Action. But if McCain wanted a woman veep, there just aren't that many truly qualified choices in the Republican Party.

I'm not. I'm suggesting that it may be an issue to some women that you are encouraging not to vote for McCain.

3894 08-29-2008 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles (Post 235943)
I'm suggesting that it may be an issue to some women that you are encouraging not to vote for McCain.

That has to be McCain's sad reasoning. Prepare to lose big, Republicans.

Alex 08-29-2008 08:48 AM

Scanning her wikipedia page...

So both VPs will have sons in Iraq at election time.

Cynical inappropriate comment coming:

Election goes to whichever campaign loses a son first.


A newborn (currently 5-months old) so as VP she'll essentially be a stay-at-home mom which should make the family values wing of the party happy.


Admits she smoked pot, but it was legal when she did.


Resigned her first state political position in protest of Republican graft. Good.

At least publicly she has called out Stevens. Good.

Anty-gay marriage. Bad but she has allowed Alaksa to move forward on giving benefits to same sex couples so not fully homophobicly bad.

The firing scandal seems to be not much of an issue.


All in all, after 5 minutes of research I see nothing particularly objectionable about her

scaeagles 08-29-2008 08:49 AM

I have no doubt it comes into play. I'm also sure it isn't the only reason, but I (and I don't know of your knowlege of Palin, which is probably more extensive than my complete lack thereof) can't say for sure.

McCain may lose big. This choice is better than, say, Leiberman along those lines, though.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.