I hated the show, so I'm not going to bother with the movie till its out on disc.

Some friends saw it last night - but there was a popcorn fire in the theater, so the audience was evacuated before the final half-an-hour. They can go back for free, but have to sit through the whole thing again in order to see the ending. Sounds like torture to me.

Reminds me of when we saw Born on the Fourth of July and a man had a seizure during a particularly intense moment. They stopped the film for a half hour while paramedics came in. This was back in the old-school film projection days.

Catching Up on Oscar Nominated Films, I'm a tad disappointed.

Beasts of the Southern Wild was very sweet, but Best Picture material? Not unless standards have drastically slipped. And I seriously don't understand all the general buzz about this movie. The young thing with the child Oscar nom was very good - but since most of her "acting" was voice-over done in studio, I look a bit askance at an Oscar nom. This film is Highly Over-Rated IMO.


Silver Linings Playbook was adorable. A sweet piece of RomCom fluff with a flavoring of mental illness, which was a cute theme affecting many of the characters - and not just the central couple - which I appreciated. But sweep of the actor categories AND Best Picture? Um, not if this movie had been released before November. No one would remember it. It's an adorable trifle. And just because actors are playing mentally ill does NOT mean those performances are automatically Oscar-worthy. I'm very tired of that trope.

BUT - I thoroughly enjoyed this film. It's just Very Overrated, IMO.


Argo was a very well-told, 70's-era true espionage tale. Very well done. Very entertaining. Also slightly over-rated imo, but only because there's such gushing about it. I've got nothing bad to say about the movie, but it didn't strike me as OMG Fantastic.


Oh well, at least I'm catching up on Oscar noms.

Les Mis is not ironic.

Reminds me of this piece I wrote on having to let go of being distant if you want to embrace all things Disney.

It's so much easier to judge things from afar than to let yourself be moved by someone else's art.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118049265/

Hey Lisa!

Interesting end note:

You'll have to ping her on Facebook, she rarely shows up here these days.

Three Movies.

:snap: Warm Bodies. A completely charming RomCom take on the zombie genre. Really sweet, not too dumb. Completely worked, which I think is quite an achievement. Nicholas Hoult, an adorable teen zombie with an inner mind quite alert and self-aware, is trapped in a zombie body that can only grunt and shamble - until he falls in love with a human girl, becoming more human in the process. The only quibble is Hoult is way cuter as a zombie and becomes kinda less attractive as he becomes more human. But that's a quibble without a complaint. The movie is adorable and funny, and you should go see it. (Besides, I have personal experience proving it's easier to be a cute zombie than a cute boy.)



:cheers: Bernie. Jack Black's finest hour as an actor. Yeah, not a particularly high bar - but this under-appreciated film is quite remarkable. And in a more perfect world, Black would have received some serious acting nominations for major awards. It's the bizarre true story of an East Texas mortician who becomes a community superstar and gets involved in a co-dependent relationship with the town's bitchy rich widow, played by Shirley Maclaine.

Alas, the good times eventually end, the bitchiness returns with a vengeance and Shirley makes Jack her lackey pet. But not before she's already entrusted him with power of attorney over her huge fortune. In a spat, Jack shoots Shirley in the back four times, killing her. But most bizarrely - and TRUE - he successfully conceals her death for NINE MONTHS.

Jack Black is insanely awesome as the title character. Do yourself a favor and rent Bernie.




:( Lastly, I finally got around to seeing Les Miserables.

What a frelling mess!


I fault the source material, and not necessarily the film. There was nothing particularly wrong with "nasal cam," as the close-up-heavy style has come to be derisively known. Also, I can't find too much fault with the decision to have all the music sung "live" and not lip-synched to prerecorded vocals. It was fine for most of the cast and arguably added an urgency and drama to the proceedings.

Much has been made of Russell Crowe's inability to sing - all too sadly true - but not enough has been made of his inability to act. He conveyed far too little menace or obsession as the intractable pursuer Javert. A very weak link in a wobbly chain.

And that's because, as a piece, and despite its vast success, Les Miserables sucks as a musical, or as anything. It's boring. The "songs" such as they are, reek of interstertial meandering and sing-songy inbetweeny droning on. There are only two what could properly be called Songs - one is a misconceived, poor-man's Sweeney Todd rip-off that is the show's only legitimate "number," but falls flat and stands out like an unwelcomely sore and third thumb. The other is a nice enough song, sung by Anne Hathaway as Fantine - - but it's absurd that she's sweeping all the awards and will likely win the Oscar for her 4-minute performance.

She's fine. But Best Supporting Actress? Pulease! She's in the film for 10 minutes, and has one song - albeit the only decent melody in the entire long piece. Yes, she sings with a swollen red crying nose. And she dies. Give her the Oscar!


I think the problem with the piece is its basically four vignettes (and Hathaway indeed features strongly in one of them), that become increasingly less interesting as they progress. Not the preferable arc of a story. Hugh Jackman is fine in the lead role as Jean Valjean - but his character completely disappears for the 3rd vignette and he hasn't really had much chance to cement his character by then - as each vignette suddenly stops and flashes forward by 10 years or so ... and it left me feeling I kept getting cut off just as I was getting to know him. Then he reappears for the last vignette, but it's too late. His whole arc has been choppy and then he comes back after being gone for a whole segment of the story. Just weird.

But an even bigger problem with the piece is, of course, the music is horrible. That's a bad thing for an operatic piece where 95% of it is sung. Yet it's also a common trap of opera, where there's too little tunefulness and too much sing-songy droning. I think Javert and Valjean each had a couple of what could be called songs - but I really couldn't tell when they started or ended. The whole piece seemed to be droning on in a vaguely musical vein of low-key dirge - except for two actual songs - as I said, one horribly ill-conceived, and the other inexplicably Oscar-bait.

Despite the purportedly epic scope of the 40-year story, it was ultimately boring. It would have been ok if it were depressing, or emotionally resonant in any way. But it was just dull.


Again, mostly due to the source material. The filmmaking was really ok. Yeah, I know it's a widely beloved piece. But it sucks. I'm a gay man, and I know musical theater. Quasi-Operas are a bit more difficult, but there are good ones and bad ones. Les Miserables is one of the worst. I can't believe this is nominated for best picture. It's a decent version of one of the worst musicals ever conceived. Do yourself a favor and skip the movie ... read the book.