![]() |
Well certainly, GD. I just meant that I have no knowledge of how the villians in the comic books have acted or alligned themselves, if at all. I would have no frame of reference to say "The scarecrow working with the Al Guhl guy? No way!".
It was well done - unlike the earlier Batman flicks you mention. I was glad that the villians weren't all altered from falling into some chemical as seemingly every villian in the other batman flicks were. |
Quote:
|
We also loved the movie. I appreciated what Tim Burton did with the first two flicks, but this one just worked as a film, without the constant reminder that we're watching a comic book come to life.
A couple of points not mentioned so far: - The fact that such a cast of stars could be in a movie and not overwhelm the script is a testament to good filmmaking. Simple as that. - The "Rachel Dawes" character did nothing for me. I hear Katie isn't coming back for the sequel. Big deal. - Like the comics and Batman:The Animated Series (out now on DVD! Buy 'em all!), Spoiler:
Heady from my experience with Batman, I was all ready to plunk my money down for the FF movie. Then I read the reviews. Looks like a bargain matinee for that one - or maybe I'll wait for HBO... |
Quote:
Spoiler:
|
Quote:
Poor Katie. She was really good in Pieces of April and The Gift. I think it was just a lame character, and boy did I hate her speech: Spoiler:
No idea if they plan on having a Ms Vale. I'm only interested in Catwoman. Man, Michelle P. was a fantastic Catwoman. Who do you think should be cast as the Joker? |
I'm going to be stubborn and say I'm bummed they are going to redo the Joker and probably Catwoman at some point. :( The Burton versions are still "the real ones" in my mind.
|
I loved Burton's vision.
But Nolan's is his own thing, and those characters will be different in his hands. I'm nothing but excited! |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.