![]() |
Quote:
|
Amazon says "Henry and Mudge" is for ages 4-8. "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" is supposedly for ages 9-12.
Are the 12-year-olds really going to get "points" for reading a book written for a 4-year-old? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
As a former geek child, I welcomed any opportunity to compete scholastically, rather than physically. Would those same parents encourage only letting kids walk laps, rather than run, because some can't run as fast or get as many laps done in the alloted time?
(Tangent: If I had to pay for every analogy used I would be so broke...) |
Maybe the competition should be for # of pages read?
|
Quote:
Well, a lot of times, they aren't. They can try harder, certainly, and perhaps acheive in that area. But no one should be made to feel as if they are good at something when they are not, or at least not as good as others. |
Quote:
|
Heehee, guys.
Our library has a standard summer reading program, and it does not count number of books read, it counts number of minutes read. The advantages to a system like this are pretty apparent. As a kid I cheated my summer reading club by reading short books and listing books that I'd read last year. Guilt to my grave. :p As for the lazy librarian, you're right in thinking you need to go above her head and get help from administrators. Librarians always have problems allowing something "disruptive" into their schedule, no matter how sensible. It's so nice a quiet when there's nobody in the library...;) |
When I was in elementary school they counted minutes, not books. I kicked ass in the competition every year.....I also won my 5th grade spelling contest. It's sad how my life has been all down hill since 5th grade.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.