They are going to pick apart her every move...lol

I still don't think she is qualified. I wonder what is in Alberto Gonzales closet, that he wasn't nominated.... must be something good....

200k a year but you gotta kiss Dubya's ass? Puhlease. I'd rather suck the devil's cheese encrusted <text deleted>.

Ivy League Smegma.....Mmmmmmmmmm Good ..

I hope I'm never held to things I've said in birthday, get well, and going away cards in my life.

The only thing worse would be if I had to live up to the things I wrote in people yearbooks back in high school.

BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court nominee said to friend "BFF" but it didn't last the summer!

or

BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court nominee said in going away card "The office won't be the same without you" when in fact he didn't even remember the person's name.

I always find it amusing how an opposing side always sees the administration's choices as "cronies". When the administration leans their way, they become simply "appointees". So much bitterness, from both sides at times. Just poor sportsmanship. the appointee could be the most qualified person on earth, and they'd still be a "cronie". Just sad...

Show me evidence that Harriet Miers is the most qualified person and I'll be satisfied. Fact is, there is none. She has no experience or record that can point one way or the other.

Miers aside, his comment is valid. You don't have to think Miers is the best qualified to know that-

I never said she was. Didn't even imply such. Simply making an observation that even if a particular appointee is the most qualified, it is irrelevant to the opposing party, and they become "cronies"...

Fair enough, I agree. But generalizations about history aside, with one pretty clear-cut case of crony apointeeism by Bush (Brown), he's invited close scrutiny upon all his nominees.

I believe the greeting card story is indicative of how very little information there is out there on Harriet. People are looking for anything on her that might explain this nomination.