Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Disneyland and all things Disney (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Pixar board approves Disney takeover (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=2728)

Not Afraid 01-23-2006 05:52 PM

This news follows some dire underground news I got about further decimation of WDI. Hmmmm.

Snowflake 01-23-2006 06:10 PM

I have misgivings and a feeling of dread. But I will hope that the spirit of Walt will endure and the corporate head of the beast will not smother the creative group at Pixar. Just let them do what they do best. I'd even vote for another installment of The Incredibles if the second time around we got more of Edna Mode.

I'm not sure about Cars, however. I'm sure it will be wonderful, but the trailers have not appealed to me.

Donna

Isaac 01-23-2006 06:13 PM

Pixar could have signed with other movie studios but refused & held out til Eisner left the WDC. Maybe this is what they wanted all along. If this deal does not effect the quality of the Pixar movies, then I'm okay with it. I'd rather have Pixar make Toy Story 3 than Disney alone.

innerSpaceman 01-23-2006 06:33 PM

Miramax did ok as an independent branch ... for quite a while.

And I will have just as easy a time ignorning "Losing Nemo Again" and "Monsters, a Limited Liability Company" as I would any Disney crapuel.

wendybeth 01-23-2006 06:46 PM

The trailer for Cars left me with the same feeling, Snow, but hopefully the movie is better.

If Disney is going to go pure CGI, then they best do it with Pixar talent and technology. Their puny attempts have royally sucked, and the thought of them making the inevitable sequels to all the Pixar films was truly frightening. I agree with Jess- if Disney is going to walk away from traditional animation, then I hope that someone else fills that void. Films like 'Spirited Away' and the like have shown that 2d isn't dead, it just needs a fresh and creative breath of life.

LSPoorEeyorick 01-23-2006 06:57 PM

Yeah, I really don't care what the animation looks like if there's a good story.

OK, that's hyperbole. What i mean is... traditional, CGI, none of this matters if the story department sucks buttermilk through a straw.

Kevy Baby 01-23-2006 08:35 PM

Interesting article in today's LA Times:

Walt's Shoes at Disney Could Be a Fit for Jobs
Quote:

What does Steve Jobs want?

With Walt Disney Co.'s board scheduled today to consider whether to buy Pixar Animation Studios, Jobs, the mercurial visionary whose iPod transformed the way Americans consume entertainment, is being compared to Disney's late founder, the mercurial visionary whose theme parks sparked similar change half a century ago.

Isaac 01-23-2006 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LSPoorEeyorick
Yeah, I really don't care what the animation looks like if there's a good story.

OK, that's hyperbole. What i mean is... traditional, CGI, none of this matters if the story department sucks buttermilk through a straw.

Hehehe. We know what ya mean ;) A good script is vital to any film.

I think it's important that both styles of animation co-exist. I love it when they combined and create beautiful scenes, such as the ballroom sequence in Beauty And The Beast.

tracilicious 01-24-2006 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby
Interesting article in today's LA Times:

Walt's Shoes at Disney Could Be a Fit for Jobs


ipods, Disneyland it's all the same...

Gemini Cricket 01-24-2006 09:32 AM

I'm hoping the takeover will increase the creativity factor over at Disney. They seem to be strapped for ideas. I mean, 'Bambi 2'? Yikes.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.