![]() |
Quote:
|
Um, yeah. What really sucks is that people will point to that and say "that's why we shouldn't legalize prostitution." :mad: Fvcking red tape BS. BTD is right, it's enslavement and nothing more.
|
What's up with "The government had considered making brothels an exception on moral grounds, but decided that it would be too difficult to distinguish them from bars. "
Brothel = sex Bar = alcohol Where's the confusion. One involves selling your body - one does not. I have the solution though. Just classify it to be the same for men too. How many straight men are going to go to work in a gay brothel (is there such a thing?)? |
... ... ... ...
I'd say more, but I'm just... speechless.... :confused: That is horrible. |
Quote:
"I can't take this job as a filing clerk because I feel it is immoral." |
I think it'd be pretty easy to decide what may be a moral decision for some. Any job of a sexual nature. It may be immoral to some to take a filing clerk job with a porno company, and they should have the right to not take the job.
|
Quote:
How about a waitress at hooters? |
These questions exist, how are they currently handled? Hooter has existed for quite a while now, can't say I've heard of anyone on unemployment being forced into slave Hooters labor. Or forced to work at a strip club, or forced to be a porn editor. It seems that whatever we have in place right now works perfectly well at allowing people their moral freedom to not be forced into morally contentious professions.
|
There are way too many directions this can go.
A vegetarian as a butcher. A hindu as an exterminator. I'm sure there are many other such examples, but I haven't the time to think of more. |
Think of as many as you like, all they do is prove the point that this isn't a concern in terms of legalizing prostitution. These are all dillemas that exist today, and they are all handled.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.