Is that even possible? She's become the queen of over exposure. I realized this when I was wandering the supermarket aisles, and the moment that I noticed a display of cracker boxes with her face on it, I hear her voice on the sound system telling me to buy some crap. Geez.

CP brought one of her cookbooks home from the library. It sucked. The recipes were so poorly written that half the time we had to have an argument about what she actually meant by each step (are we supposed to cook this down THEN add the bok choy, or do we add the bok choy first?!) before we could actually cook anything.

Heisenberg himself may have initially offered explanations which suggested this view ... Heisenberg's original argument used the 'old' quantum theory (namely, the Einstein-deBroglie relations) and provided a heuristic argument that the position and momentum observables were not simultaneously observable with infinite precision. The more modern uncertainty relations deal with independent measurements being done on an ensemble of systems.

Yes, which is NOT the same as "observing an event changes the event." The "position and momentum are not simultaneously observable" interpretation is far closer to the actual meaning of the uncertainty principle, it just ignores the fact that in reality, knowing one of the two provides a probable range of values for the second, rather than just make it unknowable. But either way, it's not the same as the observer effect.

Not trying to hijack the thread but everyone here does know that Rachel Ray has two cds: a Christmas compilation called How Cool Is This? Christmas and then some cheesy kids' compilation with her face photoshopped on the front? She obviously had nothing to do with either cd except to skim off her percentage.

That takes us to a huge question: would it be worse if these were cover albums with Rachel Ray actually singing her Christmas faves?

End of derail.

Who is Rachel Ray?

Yeah! Who?

She's a Martha Stewart wannabe.

Rachael Ray started out in this area, BTW. Her whole 30-minute meals thing started by her teaching a class at a local store.

Rachel Ray kinda bums me out. I actually liked her when she did her 30-minute meals and that show about traveling on a budget for Food TV. As soon as she got all these promotional deals... ugh. It just got stupid.

Martha Stewart was a guest on the Howard Stern radio show last week. When Howard brought up Rachel Ray as a pretender to the throne, Martha basically said that the only thing Rachel Ray does is cook, and that she'd gladly have a cook-off with her. Eat that, Rachel Ray!

Yeah, I wouldn't watch her, Moonliner. Your friend Neil's son probably has too many people talking about Rachel already.