Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Disneyland and all things Disney (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   On the subject of Goofy (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=5280)

mousepod 02-14-2007 10:02 AM

Just to add fuel to the fire... did Babbitt create Goofy? He certainly perfected the character and defined the personality - but Goofy appeared in several cartoons before Babbitt got a hold of him, didn't he?

RStar 02-14-2007 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Stroup (Post 120503)
Yeah, but would Goofy fight a mountain lion to the death to protect Billy Colman?

But what I want to know is would Goofy win in a fight with Pluto?

Alex 02-14-2007 10:34 AM

And there are real mice in the same "universe" that contains Mickey Mouse.

Some characters were human analogs and some weren't. Even if they were the same basic species.

But since the original appearance by Goofy was just as a throwaway character in a crowd scene (it was the laugh that caught Disney's tradition) things probably weren't well examined and then future designs were just based on the previous ones.

Here's Goofy in his first appearance:



Notice the human pig, goat, cow, and dog, with the more natural looking cat and dog. Ultimately I'd say that the "dogness" of Goofy is immune to logical consideration.

innerSpaceman 02-14-2007 07:59 PM

And no, Art Babbit is not the originator of Goofy in his original form. Many artists came to "create" Goofy over a span of some years, but Babbit is credited with having had far and away the most input, and thus he is deemed the primary "creator" of Goofy, even though it's acknowledged to have been a group effort.


I still don't think Goofy's face look's anything like any actual dog. It's just generally dog-like, in a cartoonish way that matches no actual canine facial anatomy.

Nephythys 02-15-2007 09:33 AM

The argument that "it doesn't make sense" just won't hold up.

The human-like animals in the Disney world eat other animals (turkey at Thanksgiving etc)

Donald is ALWAYS "nude" on the bottom- but when you take off his shirt he covers his lower body.

It doesn't have to make "sense".

mousepod 02-15-2007 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nephythys (Post 120692)
Donald is ALWAYS "nude" on the bottom- but when you take off his shirt he covers his lower body.

I was just thinking that when I was rewatching "Donald Gets Drafted" last weekend.

Not Afraid 02-15-2007 11:01 AM

The Pants Optional aspect to most cartoons always amuses me. Practical Pig wears pants while the other two do not. Pants are practical, I guess.

innerSpaceman 02-15-2007 08:06 PM

It would indeed be practical for a certain genre of "pig."


But that's a subject for another thread .... on a different message board. ;)

Cadaverous Pallor 02-15-2007 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 120550)
No ... it's that, from the pictures at least, I see only the slightest similarites. Sure, the ears. Uh-huh. But not the face.

Funny, that's what clinched it for me. Look again. The muzzle on both of them is tan, and the area around the eyes is black (minus eyebrows, which Goofy does not have). Add that to the overly long, thin and floppy, completely black ears, and I'm convinced.

I won't tell people the coonhound was the inspiration, but I'll believe it myself, regardless of grumpy detractors. ;) Oh, and yeah, nothing makes sense in cartoons.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.