Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Daily Grind (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   Congressional approval rating lower than Bush's (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=6241)

innerSpaceman 07-14-2007 01:19 PM

Bravo.









Or do I find myself reflexively agreeing with everything you write, JWBear, simply because Mr. Avatar is staring at me so intensely and persuasively??

JWBear 07-14-2007 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 150043)
Bravo.









Or do I find myself reflexively agreeing with everything you write, JWBear, simply because Mr. Avatar is staring at me so intensely and persuasively??

Whatever works! ;)

And... Here's something else. President Bush seems to think that we are a democracy...

JWBear 07-14-2007 01:52 PM

Yep...It's official. The US Government considers itself to be a democratic republic.

Quote:

What form of government do we have in the United States?
The United States, under its Constitution, is a federal,
representative, democratic republic, an indivisible union of 50
sovereign States. With the exception of town meetings, a form
of pure democracy, we have at the local, state, and national
levels a government which is: ``federal'' because power is
shared among these three levels; ``democratic'' because the
people govern themselves and have the means to control the
government; and ``republic'' because the people choose elected
delegates by free and secret ballot.

scaeagles 07-14-2007 03:15 PM

Yikes. (Scaeagles reattaches his head) How about we don't live in a direct democracy.

My point was that electing a representative does not ensure that the representative will agree with us. This was in response to alphabassettgirl saying her representative is going to vote however they please (though I doubt it was worded in that fashion).

I happen to like the referendum process because it puts issues back into the hands of the people by direct vote. My representative, once elected, has no obligation whatsoever to vote in any particular way. That person will face election again in two years.

Yikes.

sleepyjeff 07-14-2007 03:39 PM

....and to the "democracy" for which it stands...

or is it?

...and to the "republic" for which it stands...

Sometimes I forget;)

JWBear 07-14-2007 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles (Post 150083)
Yikes. (Scaeagles reattaches his head) How about we don't live in a direct democracy.

My point was that electing a representative does not ensure that the representative will agree with us. This was in response to alphabassettgirl saying her representative is going to vote however they please (though I doubt it was worded in that fashion).

I happen to like the referendum process because it puts issues back into the hands of the people by direct vote. My representative, once elected, has no obligation whatsoever to vote in any particular way. That person will face election again in two years.

Yikes.

Sorry to go off. It's a sensitive issue for me.

You are correct in that we are not a direct democracy - something the Founding Fathers did not want, for very good reasons.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 150085)
....and to the "democracy" for which it stands...

or is it?

...and to the "republic" for which it stands...

Sometimes I forget;)

Yes, the pledge says "republic". This in no way negates the fact that we are also a democracy. Why does it have to be either-or? It is, in fact, both.

I was discussing this subject with Bill earlier, and he made a very good analogy. "Republic" is the form of our government, "democracy" is the method.

sleepyjeff 07-14-2007 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 150088)
Yes, the pledge says "republic". This in no way negates the fact that we are also a democracy. Why does it have to be either-or? It is, in fact, both.

I was discussing this subject with Bill earlier, and he made a very good analogy. "Republic" is the form of our government, "democracy" is the method.

I would agree with that...........

Going back to what you said earlier about it being a fairly recent(the America is not a democracy soundbite) thing. That's because right after the 2000 election all we heard was "Gore won the popular vote...why isn't he President". There was even a movement to get rid of the Electoral College((which, btw, was when Bill Richardson gained my attention and respect...he was one of the few dems to lead the fight against it)).

But yes, we are a Democratic Republic...thank heavens; because if we were ever a true democracy we would quickly fall into mob rule followed shortly by anarchy(make Chris happy) and finally a dictatorship.

JWBear 07-14-2007 05:57 PM

My problem is with those who say we are only a republic. (Yes, they are out there. Believe me, I know.)

scaeagles 07-14-2007 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 150088)
Sorry to go off. It's a sensitive issue for me.

That's cool.

sleepyjeff 07-14-2007 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 150102)
My problem is with those who say we are only a republic. (Yes, they are out there. Believe me, I know.)



Well, on a national level we don't vote for anything(not even the President) directly....so I suppose they may have an argument(although I am not taking it up here....just saying I can see what they mean) in that regard.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.