Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Library question - audio books to ipod (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=6295)

Prudence 07-23-2007 11:58 AM

Some Kinkos have, in the past, policed self-service machines.

Cadaverous Pallor 07-23-2007 01:00 PM

What GD said. Go for it. :)

Morrigoon 07-23-2007 01:23 PM

Well, now, if you're using an iPod, then theoretically iTunes fetches the license for that disc. I don't know if each disc has its own unique license or whatnot, but if they do, then it could get interesting when the third or fourth person comes along and wants to do the same think with that disc set.

blueerica 07-23-2007 01:42 PM

Like GD, minus the wife, I've done that with library CDs.

katiesue 07-23-2007 02:05 PM

Excellent. Thanks for the input. Maddy will be so happy plus it's kept her quiet for two whole days now - woo hoo.

Kevy Baby 07-23-2007 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 152027)
Well, now, if you're using an iPod, then theoretically iTunes fetches the license for that disc.

iTunes does not seek a license for a pre-burned CD as I do not believe that CDs HAVE an individual serial number. They do have a code which says what the CD is which is how your computer gets the info (iTunes defaults to retrieving such data from CDDB).

Kevy Baby 07-23-2007 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 151995)
(for this reason one library I worked at didn't prevent a patron that came in an photocopied an entire textbook but they could not use our for-fee retrieval-and-copy service for that purpose).

Isn't it considered legal to photocopy X number of pages for research purposes? Or are laws being broken at colleges all across the country?

Or should I say "were being broken" as I wonder how much of this practice still exists in the age of the interwebs.

Prudence 07-23-2007 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 152056)
Isn't it considered legal to photocopy X number of pages for research purposes? Or are laws being broken at colleges all across the country?

"Fair use" exists as a defense to claims of copyright infringement, but there's no absolute definition of "fair use". It's not just about how many pages you copy. There are a whole bunch of factors that go into assessing fair use, and it's basically done on a case-by-case basis.

And it's not that "fair use" is a legal right - it's a defense.

Alex 07-23-2007 03:53 PM

Yes, laws are being broken all across the country.

There's a reason college professors still have to charge way above photocopying costs for those reading packets they put together. So that the campus bookstore, or whomever is doing it, can play clearances on them.

But no, nobody is going to raise a stink about photocopying a journal article for individual research purposes or a semi-lengthy excerpt from a monograph. But I knew student workers at every college library I've worked at who would use the back-room copiers to simply photocopy their entire textbook for free (to them) and save all that money on their books for the quarter.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.