![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
On the other hand, I suspect that CP is more language person, such as myself. I have always done well in math, but because I relate it to something else - usually using vocabulary and logic type questions, kind of like the SATs. And like Drince said, it's better to take a little longer coming from the correct place than it is to go quickly from the wrong place. |
Quote:
What? That was what constituted practical math in my calculus classes. But yeah, for figuring out percentages I use the cross multipication method. Or if an estimate is sufficient I would have said that since 7 is approximately 1/14th of 100 then just multiply 5 by 14 to get 70 and then subtract -- to get back to 4.8 from 5 -- .2 x 14 (2.8) to get an approximate answer (67.2%) which isn't all that far from the correct number (68.6%) and is all math that is easily done mentally. |
Whereas I would have figured that 5/7 is a about 70% (70.173 or so I believe). .2/7 is about 2.8%, so yeah, the same ~67.2% as Alex gout (though I might have gone up to 68.5, figuring in that .173).
|
Ok, fine. I was being fancy. Realistically, I'm used to the number enough that off the top of my head I know that 4.66 is 2/3rds of 7 so I'd have said "a bit more than 67%."
So, as you see, there are all kinds of ways to approach the problem. Not the least valid of which is "ask on a message board." As a nomination for "least valid" I nominated carving the question into the chest skin of a long-term comatose patient in hopes that they one day wake up and answer you. |
Why am I thinking of African Swallows right now?
|
Laden or unladen?
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.