![]() |
Quote:
|
This is actually old news. This satellite malfunctioned a while ago and it's only now that it's been officially admitted to. But no, it has nothing to do with securing sensitive hardware. The full tank of propellant has always been a worry and the concern is that on burn up the tank might possibly make it through and rain fuel down. It's remote but possible and so they're taking measures to avoid the problem before it happens.
As for the shuttle, you're exactly right, but thank all of the space critics who cried for restricting it's use after Challenger and Columbia. Thanks to all of the belly aching it's basically a glorified commuter bus to the station and back now. |
The new news is that they're shooting it down.
I happened to hear an awesome sound bite on the radio today from the press conference (which I can't seem to find online). James Cartwright was trying to stress that yes, even if they didn't shoot it down, going through the atmosphere would take care of any information anyone could try to glean from the craft itself, "with the heating, and the burning..." The way he said it sounded a lot like this guy. ![]() The only thing he didn't say was "with the GLAVIN!!!" |
Quote:
I'd also think that 120 miles up is a bit lower than they'd be comfortable doing a long stay as that's about (I believe) 200 miles lower than the shuttle's normal low earth orbit. And considering how stupidly expensive shuttle launches are it is probably still cheaper to just blow it up and start over with a new rocket launched satellite. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
![]() (But Honestly, I was just thinking about DEVO;) ) |
And Monty Python?
|
visibile € mojo
:iSm: |
Are you standing or sitting? It is hard to tell which one is supposed to be you. I always hate "left to right" when you have people sitting and standing.
|
That's pics got Boss Radio, Strangler Lewis and Euro in it.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.