He was about to blow the whistle on the secret conspiracy and had evidence that Bush and his cronies were attempting to plant anthrax manufacturing equipment in Iran to prove that Ahmadinejad is in league with bin Laden and therefore justify yet another invasion of a peace loving middle eastern nation to satisfy his bloodlust and wanton desire for imperialist America to expand their hold on oil, making his buddies and himself rich(er) beyond their wildest imaginations while forcing the American public to become (even more) beholden to their every whim because they have less and less money of their own and also destroying the planet along the way because of ignoring global warming because they want dirtier air and water to poison the very people they are trying to control.

Leo! You've finaly seen the light!! Congratulations!!! ;)

Wow, that's the truest thing I've ever seen Scaeagles post. ;)

Damn, I thought this thread was gonna be about Scott Ian's group :(

Really, the only thing I'm trying to suggest is that the official case just doesn't make sense to me. I'm not trying to suggest any specific conspiracy, just trying to figure out why there seem to be a lot more questions than answers.

I have yet to see anything that convinces me that this guy did it. His co-workers say that he couldn't have done it, not with the equipment that he had access to. The guy is a upstanding member of his church, a family man who loves his work and has been recognized by congress for his outstanding work in his field. And yet, shortly after the worst terrorist attack on American soil, he decides that he is going to attempt to kill a whole new bunch of innocent Americans, simply for monetary reasons. So, all by his lonesome, he sends out a bunch of notes which make him look Islamic.

Meanwhile, ABC is being told that there is no doubt that it is an Iraqi strain. Everyone from Bush to Cheney to McCain is subtly suggesting that it could be the Iraqis or another Islamic terrorist group. And yet, while they are doing this, it is clear from those investigating that it is American. Years before they finally get around to charging the right guy, they falsely accuse someone else, and even though they now suspect a new guy (Ivins,) they let him keep his security clearance and access to all that anthrax. And, when it comes time to charge him, they let him know ahead of time. Is that SOP? Doesn't seem like it would be, for flight reasons.

See, most criminal cases seem pretty cut and dry. All of the pieces make sense when put together. Here, you put all the pieces together and it just leads to more questions. My feelings here are nothing but pure gut feeling and I'm probably coming off as more of a kook than I would prefer, but I hate when things don't add up. I hate when there are all sorts of loose ends. And worst, I hate to see a man commit suicide, which very well may have been a combination of depression and increasing pressure, and have the suicide be used as proof that he committed a very evil act. The act that supposedly he didn't have the equipment to do. Nope, I don't like cases like that.

Heh, heh, no thanks, I'll just tip my King over right now and spare myself a day of googling:p


:)

If I ever decide to open a thread such as this again, I will first reflect upon this advice. ;)

I was thinking of the same song!