Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Egg Head (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Chrome (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=8493)

Ghoulish Delight 09-03-2008 09:21 AM

Here's an interesting theory that CP heard and brought up to me.

Chrome is a nascent OS. Memory management, talk of using it as an application platform. Moving towards the ever-present paradigm of "Let the applications exist online, using pooled processing power," or "cloud computing" as it's come to be called.

And the most genius part? Google is using Windows as a test bed. Chrome is basically a virtual machine running on top of Windows. They're tapping millions of Windows customers to help shake out their first shot at an OS platform.

That's not a bad guess as to what they're doing.

BDBopper 09-03-2008 09:25 AM

Very astute. It really makes sense because Chrome has its own task manager. If done right they could be successful. I am using Chrome right now. It is blazing fast! I like it so far...but I've only used it for five minutes.

keith - SuPeR K! 09-03-2008 09:51 AM

@Alex

Chrome is based on WebKit so if you are already testing your sites on Safari (which you should be) there really is no need to also check in Chrome.

BarTopDancer 09-03-2008 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 237017)
Here's an interesting theory that CP heard and brought up to me.

Chrome is a nascent OS. Memory management, talk of using it as an application platform. Moving towards the ever-present paradigm of "Let the applications exist online, using pooled processing power," or "cloud computing" as it's come to be called.

And the most genius part? Google is using Windows as a test bed. Chrome is basically a virtual machine running on top of Windows. They're tapping millions of Windows customers to help shake out their first shot at an OS platform.

That's not a bad guess as to what they're doing.

From what I've read I'd say CP is completely correct.

Alex 09-03-2008 10:00 AM

It's not a guess, it is pretty much the stated goal. NPR interviewed a Google product manager saying as much (though not in so much in a "we'll grind Microsoft under our bootheels" way).

But first they'll have to get their office productivity Web apps to a non-suck point if they even want to have the slimmest of chances. And then offer them in a convenient way such it can been used as an enterprise solution without in any way exposes corporate information to life outside a firewall*. We're expressly forbidden from using them here at work.



*They may already have that, but if so it isn't ever coming up as an option that I've seen.

Alex 09-03-2008 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keith - SuPeR K! (Post 237035)
@Alex

Chrome is based on WebKit so if you are already testing your sites on Safari (which you should be) there really is no need to also check in Chrome.

We don't (officially). But it wouldn't matter. Regardless of how identical the rendering is supposed to be, each officially supported browser gets tested separately.

Cadaverous Pallor 09-03-2008 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 237038)
From what I've read I'd say CP is completely correct.

Like GD said, I read about it, just like you and others have, wasn't my (totally genius) idea.

I say awesomeness - bring on the Microsoft killa.

BarTopDancer 09-03-2008 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 237131)
Like GD said, I read about it, just like you and others have, wasn't my (totally genius) idea.

I say awesomeness - bring on the Microsoft killa.

I totally thought he said it was a thought you had, not heard. Sorry!

/goes to the corner to sleep now.

Gemini Cricket 09-03-2008 04:22 PM

I like Chrome so far. I like the less cluttered top portion.
:)

Gemini Cricket 09-03-2008 04:25 PM

Hmm. Weird. The Quick Links tab doesn't show up when I am on Lot using Chrome.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.