Well obviously she wears the pant(suit) in that family and the husband stays home to be the stay-at-home dad to their five children, right? Especially considering their youngest one has Down Syndrome.

Except her husband works too.

Saw this on another discussion board I belong to...
:D

Sorry I wasn't clear! The way to circumvent the sexism defense is to send out some senior senator women Dems to poke Palin, then have Biden simply repeat those pokes in a debate with her. My .02, anyway.

Considering the uproar (on the left) at every remote sexist slight of Hillary Clinton, I hope the people doing it quickly realize how silly they end up looking with this MILF and shaggable stuff.

Fair question as to whether she has enough history to warrant VP let alone potential presidency. But it almost makes me want to vote for her simply as a form of apology for the number of people who's second response to her nomination (after "who?") was an evaluation of her ****ability.

Between the two, who would I want as president if something awful were to happen? The person with the experience or the person without? I'd say the former.

Between the two, who do you want to be president if nothing happens? The one with the experience or the one without?

While I think this blunts McCain's ability to criticize Obama's relative lack of experience since it would now rebound on McCain, I think Obama and supporters have to be very careful to not criticize Palin for lacking experience since that rebounds on them as well.

Yeah, I think the experience thing is still a losing proposition for Obama. Unless he wants to talk about death or assassination, which would be really kind of creepy.

Of course, my answer is that I don't consider "experience" to be that significant a factor in choosing a president and it certainly hasn't be a great indicator of presidential success in the past.

Phonetic Fruedian slip?