![]() |
Ok, I've never heard of Contol or Ian Curtis. Huh? and What?
^ and except for LSPoorEeyorick's review above, Lars has been pretty much universally panned. I guess different people disagree about where that ledge is. But as it's starring Ryan Gosling, I will be seeing this film .... eventually. |
Ian Curtis was the lead singer for Joy Division, an influential post-punk artist prone to epileptic seizures, and a suicide at age 23. Newcomer actor Sam Riley looks to be a dead ringer, and the film should be intriguing for folks interested in the era. Obviously, it isn't going to be a feel-good pic.
|
What reviews are you reading?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Manola Dargis and Lisa Schwartzbaum and a few others panned it - those with qualms were those who, IMO, simply didn't allow for the fairy-tale aspect or the suspension of disbelief. |
I'm interested in Lars but am put off a bit by the fact that several of the critics I tend to skew with all have issues with it. And I must admit that when I watch the trailer I get a very strong whiff of Kapra which generally isn't a good thing.
On the other hand, an article in today's Chronicle referenced Harvey which is a very good point in its favor. So, I'll wait and see it and find out. But you can say of any movie "it is good if you just go along with it." Any nonsense or setup can fly, in my opinion, but the responsibility isn't necessarily on me to just relax and open myself up to it but on the film to make me want to. In other movie reviews, Michael Clayton is very solid. Not great and a little too long. But it really brings home two emerging truths: 1. George Clooney, somehow, has become the person that simply doesn't make bad movies. They're not all great, but it has been a long time since he was in an outright bad one. The only other name of someone similar (who works regularly unlike say Daniel Day-Lewis who works every few years) is Russell Crow. 2. Not since Cary Grant has god put on this earth a man so perfectly designed for wearing suits on the big screen. |
Quote:
If I care all that much, I'll check Rotten Tomotoes for something, but I'm usually only interested in those opinions after I've seen a film. Going in, I only register the opinions I didn't go looking for. Friends' opinions matter most, so LSPoorEyorick's trumps anything I've read. A film featuring Ryan Gosling needs no prodding from anyone, though. I even saw his last piece of trash, Fractured, and it sucked ... but he was still good. |
Quote:
|
It has been a long, long time since I have been to the movies.
I think "Hairspray" was the last thing I saw... But I did buy "Zodiac", "The Lives of Others", "Host" and "Flags of our Fathers". Used. 4 for $20 at Hollywood Video. I have yet to watch them... |
The Lives of Others was seriously overrated, imo. Zodiac only mildly entertaining (but it's got, mmmmm, Jake), and I liked Fags of our, er, excuse me, Flags of Our Fathers way better than the better-received Letters from Iwo Jima.
Never heard of Host. Huh? |
Quote:
"Flags of our Fathers" was also compelling, though I liked its companion, "Letters from Iwo Jima", much more. |
Jake Jake Jake... :)
I liked Letters from Iwo Jima a great deal, too. I bought The Lives of Others just because I like the director's name a lot: Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck. It makes me laugh everytime I say it. :D |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.