You can (or at least could once up a time) see something similar with U.S. and Canada flags at the Blaine crossing into Canada (where you'd cross if you were driving from Seattle to Vancouver, B.C.).

When I see stuff like that, I think about how someone had to put up their gigantic flag first. Then the other responded not to be upstaged. I also think about how they must have had meetings on each side to decide how big the flag was going to be, how tall the pole should be, who was going to supply the rope to hoist it, who was going to pour the cement at the base etc. All done with a gigantic cost involved.
:D

I have to laugh at the thought of building a 2,000 mile long wall, in this day and age. Ya know, without slaves and general anachronism.

I'm all for border control, too. And for the sun rising in the damn West for a change.

It's a 2,000 mile-long border to an economically devasted portion of the hemisphere. Harder though it might seem than erecting a King Kong Wall, changes MUST be made to keep those people solvent in their home countries. Nothing else is going to work. You can't stop immigration with force.

Even if you were willing to kill everyone coming across the border, you'd need 846,000 men with rifles to man the Kong Wall 24/7. Pulease.

Tax dollars at work.

iSm said 'erect'.
:D

I agree. I don't really think building a wall would be all that difficult but it isn't going to solve the problem that creates the desire for the wall.

We need to make legal immigration more appealing than illegal immigration. And we need to encourage people to prefer staying where they are. Alternatively, we create a fund so that each mont every resident of Belize is given $2,000. Then all the Meixcans will illegally immigrate to Belize.

Still, a wall is better than nothing. Having nothing there is almost analogous to a welcome mat.

If you're climbing over a wall or somehow getting past it, at least it's a strong reminder that you aren't wanted on the other side of it. And it may serve to deter some people wanting to cross depending on how it is built.

I have to ask why building a wall is a general anachronism? Maybe if you are of the belief that we should all be interconnected; who cares about nations? We're all citizens of the world!

Pshah. I don't buy that for a minute.

We're not talking about an 8 foot cinderblock wall or a chain link fence here, though. We're talking high tech.

From what i've read, the fence would include an underground barrier of rods shoved down into the ground so that attmpts to tunnel under it would be virutally impossible. It would be a duel fence with 100 or so yards between them with motion and tunneling detectors. Should someone successfully surpass the first fence, the amount of time required to get over the second would allow border patrols to easily apprehend those in the zone.

I would think that if you're cramming yourself into the back of a sweltering panel van, or hiking 40 miles through desert terrain with minimal supplies, or crawling through a claustrophobic mud tunnel, and all with a decent chance of death that the awareness you're not supposed to be where you're going is pretty strong.

I don't think a wall is anachronistic, just pointless and excessive.

Meanwhile, this morning's big story on the local news is that some painters left their work early to join the rally earlier this week and were fired for being AWOL. Fired for leaving work mid-day without permission! Shocking! :rolleyes: