Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   The day the music died. (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=10037)

LSPoorEeyorick 10-27-2009 07:15 AM

Heh, I bet their administration would have had a heyday with Tom's high school. They did a production of Sondheim's "Company," which is an excellent musical involving much, much, much discussion of sex, alcoholism, drug use...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sondheim
Have I got a chick for you! Wait till you meet her!
Have I got a chick for you, boy!
Hoo, boy!
Smart! And into all those exotic mystiques--
The Kama Sutra and Chinese techniques.
I hear she knows more than seventy-five.
Call me tomorrow if you're still alive!


Cadaverous Pallor 10-27-2009 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 304048)
That whole bit must have been cut out of our version (what replaced Into The Woods when the Northridge Earthquake sidelined our first read-thru. Stupid Working). Then again, I only really remember the housewife (my part) the waitress (part I auditioned for), the person whining about Guantanamera as elevator music, and I think a trucker?

I believe that this play is actually really long, and each bit is a separate song or monologue, so schools pick and choose bits. It was the principal who edited our version of Working.



Um, a "student version" of a play about infidelity, murder, more infidelity, more murder? Exactly how do you do that?

flippyshark 10-27-2009 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 304073)
Um, a "student version" of a play about infidelity, murder, more infidelity, more murder? Exactly how do you do that?

If it's Shakespeare or opera, it isn't seen as a problem.

I think Chicago has earned enough cultural cachet to keep company with the classics.

lashbear 10-27-2009 08:13 AM

Just put a sign up at the entrance to the auditorium saying:

Quote:

Ladies and Gentleman, you are about to see a story of murder, greed, corruption, violence, exploitation, adultery and treachery. All those things we hold near and dear to our hearts…
I think PC has gone too far these days. I was about 14 when I first went to see Chicago in 1980 with Mum & Dad. We all loved it. :cool:

Strangler Lewis 10-27-2009 08:32 AM

I was ten when my parents took me to see the movie version of "Cabaret."

I like the songs, but most of it was over my head, and I thought the MC was a little weird.

Ghoulish Delight 10-27-2009 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lashbear (Post 304081)
Just put a sign up at the entrance to the auditorium saying:



I think PC has gone too far these days. I was about 14 when I first went to see Chicago in 1980 with Mum & Dad. We all loved it. :cool:

I don't think CP disagrees, I think she's just questioning - what exactly can be cut out of Chicago to somehow make it a "student" version that avoids all non-pcness? It's hard to imagine any amount of editing that would satisfy objectors, there isn't a moment in the play that's not about some sort of immorality.

LSPoorEeyorick 10-27-2009 10:57 AM

That's the thing. Nothing needs to be cut out of Chicago to be a "student" version. I hardly think Chicago will be the raciest thing they see all week. Flippy is right on point when he talks about opera and Shakespeare.

Ghoulish Delight 10-27-2009 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LSPoorEeyorick (Post 304107)
That's the thing. Nothing needs to be cut out of Chicago to be a "student" version. I hardly think Chicago will be the raciest thing they see all week. Flippy is right on point when he talks about opera and Shakespeare.

Again, I don't think we disagree here. What I can't fathom is, what exactly did the admin. think they were getting with the "student version" that they were under the impression was being produced? If one objects to anything in Chicago, I can't imagine a version that would be considered unobjectionable. That's not to say that I agree that there is anything objectionable, just that it doesn't compute that if you are someone who objects to the un-edited play that there could possibly exist a version you don't object to.

So I guess that means that either the admin. had no more than a vague idea about the content of the play and just took someone's word for it that they had a version that was somehow censored to remove anything objectionable. Or, more likely, some parent with pull got wind and their sensibilities were offended so they made noise.

blueerica 10-27-2009 11:12 AM

So, we agree, then?

Haha...

Prudence 10-27-2009 02:56 PM

What, does that one parent have nekked jpgs of the administrators? Or, did their kid not get the lead and now there can be no musical?

Is this a public or private school?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.