Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Beatnik (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Miscellaneous Movie Musings the Sequel (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=10093)

innerSpaceman 11-16-2009 05:59 PM

I didn't exactly hate 2012, but there wasn't all that much to recommend it.

It would make a great double bill with George Pal's When Worlds Collide, of which it was basically a remake. It had that same sensibility, too. In other words, too earnest by half. Except for some scenes with Woody Harrelson's crazy radio host character, the movie was not tongue-in-cheek enough. It didn't need to be farcical, but a touch more self-awareness in a movie this earnest about the end of the world would have made it work better in our post-1953 world of cinema.

I think it only works in the context of a remake of that George Pal film, so a good double bill is possible -- if you've got several hours to spare. 2012 was so long, I felt it was going to be 2012 when we left the theater.



The destruction of Los Angeles, as seen extensively in the latest trailer, is the most fun segment. Followed by the fantastic eruption of, well, most of Yellowstone National Park. Other than those, the film was surprisingly short on fun world destruction scenes. That surprised me. I don't exactly want my $15 back ... but I was expecting something more funpocalyptical.

Deebs 11-16-2009 06:16 PM

iSm, what did you think of John Cusack's performance?

innerSpaceman 11-16-2009 06:20 PM

Eh, he was alright. I think he was kinda phoning it in a bit though. He's pretty likable no matter what, but ....


Spoiler:
... when they milked the possibility of his character's death at the end of the movie ... I wouldn't have been upset had they really killed him off.

Deebs 11-16-2009 06:27 PM

Hah, I couldn't help but read the spoiler.

Gemini Cricket 11-16-2009 06:31 PM

I wonder how big the box office is going to be for the opening of New Moon. I have a feeling it's going to be huge. No interest really in seeing it, tho.

innerSpaceman 11-16-2009 07:30 PM

I just wanna see the scene with the shirtless he-wolves in the woods.


Actually, the trailer looked pretty cool. I enjoyed it more than I did the entire first movie. I HATE that girl, and the whole thing was vapid. I might rent the sequel later ... just to skip to the werewolf clan parts, ya know, where they just hang out in the forest without their shirts on for, apparently, no reason.

SzczerbiakManiac 11-16-2009 07:53 PM

Do they need a reason to take their shirts off?

I say "no!"

innerSpaceman 11-16-2009 08:57 PM

Well, i guess they have to be prepared to transform into werewolves at any moment ... no need to rip those trendy Abercrombie shirts in the process.

Andrew 11-17-2009 10:40 AM

I didn't care enough about Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant to want to pay to see it in the theater, but I do like John C. Reilly so I downloaded a pretty poor-quality cam version and we watched it on the plane.

Verdict: Solid miss. There's really no particular reason for this movie to exist.

lashbear 11-17-2009 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 306425)
The destruction of Los Angeles, as seen extensively in the latest trailer, is the most fun segment. Followed by the fantastic eruption of, well, most of Yellowstone National Park. Other than those, the film was surprisingly short on fun world destruction scenes. That surprised me. I don't exactly want my $15 back ... but I was expecting something more funpocalyptical.

I hope Sydney got a few seconds of airtime... We're worth destroying, too, ya know ! :D


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.