If anybody really thinks that is the poll I would have added, then you have never read a thread I have started. But thanks.

Actually, I tried a shower radio and due to the location of our house (poor reception area), I couldn't get any stations. Since extra trips are not required for the radio, it still qualifies for efficiency of movement.

Chuck Noland still says why do you need to move the radio back and forth as you still waste time picking it up and setting it down.

Also, it's a shower. You know where all the parts are. Save money and time by not turning on the light. And why is your switch for the fan so far apart from the light switch that it requires a separate trip. Rebuild your bathroom if necessary. And hire someone to run an antenna into your house.

B+. And if you keep arguing it will be a B.

But, but, but...

But this way you can see how the vote goes before revealing that Option 3 is "a goat, in a train station, with a prop bludgeon."

I like this Chuck Noland fella. Tell me who he is so I don't have to waste effort looking him up on Google.

He's an expert on showering and package logistics efficiency. Unfortunately, he was forced to go four years without a shower only to come home to a bitch with no patience.

Typing "Chuck Noland" into a search takes less time than typing the above post, especially since the post includes the name "Chuck Noland" in it...:p

I take baths.

I too am a bath girl, but if I do shower I wait till my husband has soap all over his face and then push him away from the spray while I wash my hair. :evil: