uh-huh...

I agree that there's a scale. I don't think I'm on either end.

I'd absolutley say there's a scale. Honetly, I believe there's a scale for all things behavioral. Up for constant debate, however, are the related questions 1) Is your position on the scale inate and 2) assuming there is at least a hard-wired component, can socialization actually change your position on the scale, or does it simply cause you to deny/ignore/repress your position on the scale?

Myself, I'm firmly (hehe) on the straight end. I suppose I'd probably not be a solid zero because I'm not the "eww gross" type, but males hold zero attraction for me. I have no idea what women see in us, but hey, I thank you ladies for seeing whatever it is ;)

Me? I do like women. I admit it. I'm definitely not down-the-middle bi. I don't see myself able to have as deep an emotional relationship with a woman. And I really enjoy what men have to offer. ;) But I could definitely have fun with a woman without hang-ups.

My very subjective view is that sex is sex, and that if you blindfold anyone and stimulate them they'll enjoy themselves, no matter if the giver is male or female. Certain acts are going to be a matter of personal preference, of course. But I'm able to look at a female and be ok with the fact that we could get each other off. Don't know why men in this country are ingrained with such taboos against their own kind.

Yeah, weird, huh? There are many many societal taboos that I've divested myself of, and I'm hardly the stereotypical machismo-driven male. But that's just one that I don't see myself getting past, it is just distasteful to me (and to be clear, it's not distasteful that other people enjoy it, it's just not what I'd enjoy). Of course, it's entirely possible that in my case, it's NOT a social pressure thing, that I'm just on that end of the scale. But is there really a way to know? Considering the disparity, from my observation, between the number of straight-identified women who say they'd be willing to experiment and the number of straight-identified men who say they'd be willing, there's definitely some sort of external influence. But even in a perfect world where that isn't there, there will still be (based on the Kinsey model, and my own beliefs) a certain percentage who are simply on one end of the scale or the other.

I am fascinated with Kinsey, his life, his studies and how his finding effected our society. From a sociological point of view, it is fascinating!

Personally, I am not quite sure where I would stand on the scale. I am much pickier about who I am attracted to now that I am older. My "A List" for men I actually know has even gotten shorter. I look for the elusive "chemestry" as well as physical attraction. It's the same with women, and much harder to find the chemestry I require.

Basing on actual experience, I'm probably a 2 or, unlikely, a 3. But, most of that experience is long ago when I was a lot more "free" about my sex life. Today, if I were to add people into my "sexual pantheon" they'd all be men. I do love men. ;)

I think there are gray areas for sexuality. There are grey areas for just about everything. I rarely find anything that is either black or white. The Kinsey scale is a good theory, but, based on practice only, I think it leaves out a lot.

I do remember thinking, the first time I was attracted sexually to a woman, OH NO I'M GAY! I didn't think you could be somewhere in the gray area. Ahhhhh, thank God for knowledge.

I would have to put myself somewhere between a 4 and 5 on the Kinsey Scale. On rare occasion, I do find myself attracted to someone of the opposite sex. I don't believe that I would be able to remain content though, were I to pursue it. In my 20's, I had a relationship with a woman that I was very attracted to emotionally and physically, but deep down, I knew that my overall preference was predominantly male.

And with that, I knew that a long-term monogamous relationship with a woman was not going to be fulfilling. My stimulation and desires were too strong in the opposite direction and, long-term, that just wasn't going to work. Later, when I fell in love with someone of the same-sex, I was able to find a relationship that felt far more genuine and fulfilling.

So the attraction to both sides remains, but emotionally, I know where I'm supposed to be.

In general, I think there is a lot more grey area in life than we would sometimes like to admit, especially regarding sexuality. I question whether women are more likely to have bisexual feelings then men. I simply feel that women are more comfortable being honest with themselves and have fewer hang-ups. I don't question that there are many people like GD who just don't have any attraction for the same-sex and I don't think we really have any ability to change who we are attracted to, at least not in a healthy way. Still, I think that there are many many males, who have thought about a same-sex encounter, who would never reveal it to anyone in a million years.

I watched the classic "On The Town" yesterday. There was a line when they meet up with Ann Miller in the museum where someone references Dr. Kinsey. I giggled and thought of this thread. :)

I'm reading Kerouac's On the Road (for obvious research purposes), and it mentions a bar that Kinsey used to frequent for his interviews, claiming that his friends were part of his studies. It all comes back around, baby...