Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Disneyland and all things Disney (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   WDW Resorts say Bye-bye to Smoking! (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=5743)

Alex 05-01-2007 07:30 PM

Yes, because, frankly, Grand California security are all a bunch of pervs.

innerSpaceman 05-01-2007 07:32 PM

Ah, then it's cameras, is it?

Alex 05-01-2007 07:33 PM

Yes, but only in the bathrooms.

So don't smoke there.

lashbear 05-01-2007 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Capt Jack (Post 133910)
a crotch, under the right circumstances, is indeed a tool

You said it !! :evil:

lashbear 05-01-2007 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BarTopDancer (Post 133932)
The GrandCal already has this in place. No smoking in their rooms or on the balcony's of their rooms.

Anyone know how they manage that?

They just need to install the highly sensitive smoke detectors used in airplane toilets, then rig them to "Claire De Room Stinkbug Juice" smellitzers that douse the occupants thouroughly when smoke is detected.

That'd stop them. :D

Oh, and don't make toast on your Travel Iron, or else ! :eek:

cirquelover 05-02-2007 08:30 AM

I've never had a problem finding a smoking room, if I want one. I just won't stay on property anymore, no big deal.

My question is, are they really going to do that thorough of a cleaning job on the smoking rooms they have now in order to bring them up to par with the non smoking rooms.
I was a maid in my youth and I can tell you they really can't get the smell out of a heavily smoked in room. If someone spills water on the carpet or curtains the smell will return.

wendybeth 05-02-2007 09:40 AM

My friend owns a bio-cleanup service, and their equipment is pretty heavy-duty. It completely eradicates a place of dead body odor and the like, so I imagine there is similar equipment for smoke removal.

I no longer smoke, but I will never agree with discriminating against smokers. If a business decides to not allow it (I mean, how hard is it to set aside a few rooms out of the thousands they have?) then that's their right, but they're telling a good chunk of their market they don't want them around.

Ghoulish Delight 05-02-2007 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wendybeth (Post 134040)
I no longer smoke, but I will never agree with discriminating against smokers. If a business decides to not allow it (I mean, how hard is it to set aside a few rooms out of the thousands they have?) then that's their right, but they're telling a good chunk of their market they don't want them around.

If they're getting more complaints then they are getting requests for smoking rooms, then that's probably exactly what they want to tell that part of the market.

blueerica 05-02-2007 03:34 PM

Like I said, it seems like any accusation of smoking in a room is shady. What if the room is cleaned, it's unreported that it smelled like smoke. Next guy comes along, stays a night or two and its reported that the room smells like smoke, and he gets assessed the charge.

It just seems like such a sketchy thing to reinforce, and there's little that will convince me that they can do so effectively, without cameras being put in the room.

katiesue 05-02-2007 04:41 PM

My guess is it's supposed to act as a deterant. Like the high fines for the carpool lane. Although of course that's more clear cut if you're in the carpool lane by yourslef you're busted.

But just the fact that you could be liable may make a person think twice.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.