| AllyOops! |
09-10-2007 11:36 AM |
It's Britney, bitch! :p
My opinion? I thought Britney looked incredibly hot. Her very obvious extensions made me a little sad (you should really not be able to see the glue and the line of the tracts) & she was very sluggish. She had a lifeless, dead look in her pretty eyes and she just didn't have very much energy. She would come to life for a second and then whammo! Dunzo. However, overweight?!?!? Are you kidding me? Because we can't see her ribcage & clavicle protruding? Britney's body is very womanly & sexy.
I must love her new song because I can't get it out of my mind! Gimmee Gimmee Gimmee more..
The reason I'm a little defensive over Britney's performance is because most people commenting online at various celebrity gossip & magazine sites are acting as if she was a weak spoke in an otherwise fantastic & smooth wheel.
The show kinda sucked. Party suites? Are you kidding me? They cut nearly every performance! (I will say that I really enjoyed Chris Brown & Rihanna).
In trying to be unpredictable, the VMA's have become incredibly predictable and ho-hum. They aren't edgy. They aren't a showcase of talent. It's a chance for a bunch of mediocre artists to congregate and celebrate the kind of assholery that isn't tolerated by me, you or anybody else in everyday life.
|
