We do flow a little looser here, but I'm not terribly thrilled with what just happened. I'd really like not to have to deal with any of this type of BS. But, so it goes for now.

I think if someone gives someody some bad mojo, there should be no rule or even polite agreement to disallow outing of said mojo. If you feel strongly enough in our small and typically cordial internet community to give negative you should be be man or woman enough to accept that it was made public.

Sounds good to me

Personally, I feel it is bad form to discuss it publicly. But that is just my opinion.

And FWIW, I am guilty of doing so in the past (outing a negative mojo). But I like to think I have learned from it.

Oh! I remember KOH. He said I was "Anal". I don't think I'm anal. Do you? No I'm not. I'm analytical, perhaps a bit (just a bit) cynical, sarcastic and on occasion condescending, but anal? I can't see that being a fair description. However just to be safe, perhaps I better go back over all my old posts and devise a rating scale for their analness. If I rank each post on a sliding scale based on the overall seriousness of the topic being discussed then I could perform a simple regression analysis to determine an overall anal rating. I could then compare that to other random posts to see where on the bell curve of analisity I fall. That would then provide incontrovertible proof that I am in fact not the least bit above average in being anal. At least around here.

hmm, I wonder how he is- last I heard his health was failing.

Are you trying to out-AR me???

I am the KING of AR!!!

I *think* he posts on MiceChat - or at lest he used to.

The word is anality. Get a dictionary.


Not that I did, or anything.

A remake, Eh?

I just saw The Birds for the first time the other night, and the young Tippi Hendren was HOT!