Pssst! Hey Mousepod, looks like we have our first draftie!


I can't speak for MP, but I plan to keep 99% of this process right here for now. The only "private" thing I can think of right now would be the technical details of linking servers to form a mega-wiki.

Let's run with that... Given the freedom to do so, how would you design a HM page? What type of info would you put on the page? What features would you like? I'm thinking that a seperate message thread for each attraction would be overkill.

I'm with you. We should connect privately for the technical junk. The LoT is the perfect place to work out the rest of the details.

Initial thoughts on an "attraction" object:

History button - Link to MP's place
(do you plan to include the attraction backstories?)

Main photo that is a link to more photos

Tips - ie The goat trick

Special experiences - Potc ride with 20 people in floral prints...

101/Rehab info

News - The snake is working, for the moment...

General comments.

Disclaimer - I know very little about Wikis, and my ideas are based more on the capabilities of the imdb and blogs.

What I"m thinking regarding "message threads" is much like imdb. At the bottom of each movie page there's a mini-message board. It features the top few threads on the topic. If you want older threads, you click a link to see the full message board. It doesn't have to be as full featured as a board like this - it could be just for notes and corrections, for perusal by the Attraction Administrator. :)

Ok, so if I get this right, you mean that mousepod would have a seperate site with his historical attraction info? The basic credits for an attraction really wouldn't take up a huge amount of space (at least, the classic ones - I'm sure we can get much more info on who did what for the newer attractions). But I can see the need to link to more detailed info. Don't know where the info should be hosted, but I'm definitely thinking imdb style.

I'm thinking - list of Imagineers involved and a one-liner of what they contributed, ie, Rolly Crump - Conceptual Artwork. "Rolly Crump" would be a link to the Rolly Crump page, listing all the stuff he did for Disney with links to their pages, as well as photos and a bio. "Conceptual Artwork" would link you to pictures of the artwork plus perhaps a pic of him working on it. A short blurb (or perhaps a long one) could talk about his contributions to the Mansion project, where you can see his influence in the attraction, what wasn't included and why. If we have dates and such, include them.
I would. They can get quite detailed, so definitely a link, with perhaps a one-liner visible on the page. I'm thinking of Lost Boy's Jungle Cruise info from a while ago...whew, quite a read!
Cool. That's another thing that would need to be maintained. Updates when the attraction is changed (happens more often than one might think), archives for older pictures chronicling changes. Users could supply pics of other angles etc, but that'd have to be watched, since we don't want ridiculous amounts of pics for users to wade through.
This is something I hadn't thought of. Cool concept. This, I woudn't mind opening up for user interface, ala hiddenmickeys.org. We could even have a rating system for it like hiddenmickeys kinda does with it's "Confirmed" set-up. If a suggestion sucks, perhaps enough bad ratings could make it disappear?
A special trip report section would be fun, with it's own pics section perhaps. This could get quite lengthy. Do we want to concentrate on concise information or the community aspect? This is definitely more a community thing, which would be a cool thing to link to.
Definite must. I envision this near the top of the page: "Status: Open" or "Status: Under Rehab until 7/17/2005" or "Status: Closed Permanently as of 9/8/1998". This would also be a link to a calendar of future rehabs.
A quick, easy to update blog-style set-up so that the Attraction Admin can put up the latest news is a great idea.

I volunteer to help. :) I think you could easily get one person to sign up for each attraction, and if not, well hey, we'll see how tough the workload is and perhaps we could each take on a couple of them. I say start small for beta testing (just a few attractions at first) and grow it as you learn what the heck this will entail.

Great input, CP!
Now that this is becoming a joint effort, I'm back to the original idea of an imdb-style site for the historical stuff. I was thinking wiki (MikiWiki?, HWOE (Happiest Wiki on Earth)?) for the dynamic element. It sounds like Moonliner's part could be that, with the historical stuff being more of a static, link-filled db.
Now all I need is time. I have to edit a wild interview for MousePod #9 sometime in the next 48 hours...

Wiki Example
 

Here is a good wiki example from www.wikipedia.org.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haunted_Mansion

Notice how just about everything is cross linked. That is a central feature of a Wiki....

A DisWiki would be awesome. If there is anything I can do please let me know.

I have to say my experience with SharePoint has been negative. Perhaps it's the way ours has developed but I find it hard to navigate and cluttered.

Coldn't you wait a few more days to post this? That way the thread would have been a full one year old when it was resurrected ;)

I saw a spider looking at it and thought it was a new thread.

:( I'll go stand in the corner and bow my head in shame. :(






:p