Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Daily Grind (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   CA Supreme Court to rule on Gay Marriage today (5/15) at 10:00am (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=7906)

innerSpaceman 09-24-2008 12:11 PM

No of course that's hogwash, Kevy. And blatant LDS propaganda.


Government officials will have to mary queers, churches will not.



By the way, I will be coming out of wedding officiant retirement to perform gay weddings if Prop 8 fails. But I can't be sued for not performing straight weddings. :p

Morrigoon 09-24-2008 12:12 PM

Hmm... I wonder if enough people will make the mistake in our favor in the voting booth?

Better make sure everyone on the "no" side knows to vote no though!

Ghoulish Delight 09-24-2008 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 241573)
I have been meaning to look this up, but I just don't have the time.

I was listening to some people who say that if Prop 8 passes, that their church can be sued if they refuse to marry homosexuals. On the surface, this sounds like hogwash, but I can see some potential (legal) validity to this.

Anybody got any info on this?

But now that I think about it, tell them that they're right. That if prop 8 passes, their church will be overun by the gay and they will all go to jail if all members of the congregation don't immediately begin having gay sex.

No on 8!

innerSpaceman 09-24-2008 12:14 PM

What was it only altar boys that got to have sex with Catholic priests? I've always wanted to do that, in the confessional booth.

Hmmm, so if Prop 8 fails, maybe I'll be able to sue for my chance! :evil:

Kevy Baby 09-24-2008 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 241579)
Um, I assume you mean if Prop 8 doesn't pass.

DOH! Yes, you are correct.

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 241580)
No of course that's hogwash, Kevy. And blatant LDS propaganda.

I figured as much, but I wanted wanted to make sure I wasn't losing my mind (okay, that DID happen a long time ago). And I know that one of the two callers I heard did specifically say they were LDS.

Alex 09-24-2008 12:16 PM

I can see a slim argument if church weddings are considered a public accommodation.

But churches are currently allowed to refuse to perform plenty of otherwise legal marriages (a Catholic Church is free to refuse to marry people who are previously divorced) so I don't think anyone is likely to make the argument.

JWBear 09-24-2008 12:16 PM

I read one legal opinion (I'll try and find it again later, when I have more time) that no such lawsuit would stand. However, if there is a church that routinely rents out their facilities to non-church members, it is a public accommodation, and has to allow gays (or anyone, for that matter) to rent the facilities for weddings.

Gemini Cricket 09-24-2008 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 241573)
I have been meaning to look this up, but I just don't have the time.

I was listening to some people who say that if Prop 8 passes, that their church can be sued if they refuse to marry homosexuals. On the surface, this sounds like hogwash, but I can see some potential (legal) validity to this.

Anybody got any info on this?

-
Quote:

There is an important difference between religious marriage and civil marriage. Religious groups and clergy members have a constitutionally protected right to recognize or refuse to recognize religious marriages based on the tenets of their particular faith. That has not changed and will not change (if Prop 8 is voted down). But the government can't treat same-sex couples differently when issuing civil marriage licenses or solemnizing civil marriages.

katiesue 09-24-2008 12:23 PM

I don't think they could force churches to perform the ceremonies. If you're not an LDS Church member you can't even attend a wedding in the Temple in Salt Lake. If you're not Catholic you can't be married in a Catholic Church or be married without going through their counseling. I don't see how performing or not performing a gay marriage would be any different than the restrictions on a hetro one.

Pirate Bill 09-24-2008 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by katiesue (Post 241592)
If you're not an LDS Church member you can't even attend a wedding in the Temple in Salt Lake.

LDS bishops do, on occasion, perform marriages outside the temple. These marriages (as well as any other legally recognized marriage between one man and one woman) are currently recognized by the church.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.