![]() |
No of course that's hogwash, Kevy. And blatant LDS propaganda.
Government officials will have to mary queers, churches will not. By the way, I will be coming out of wedding officiant retirement to perform gay weddings if Prop 8 fails. But I can't be sued for not performing straight weddings. :p |
Hmm... I wonder if enough people will make the mistake in our favor in the voting booth?
Better make sure everyone on the "no" side knows to vote no though! |
Quote:
No on 8! |
What was it only altar boys that got to have sex with Catholic priests? I've always wanted to do that, in the confessional booth.
Hmmm, so if Prop 8 fails, maybe I'll be able to sue for my chance! :evil: |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I can see a slim argument if church weddings are considered a public accommodation.
But churches are currently allowed to refuse to perform plenty of otherwise legal marriages (a Catholic Church is free to refuse to marry people who are previously divorced) so I don't think anyone is likely to make the argument. |
I read one legal opinion (I'll try and find it again later, when I have more time) that no such lawsuit would stand. However, if there is a church that routinely rents out their facilities to non-church members, it is a public accommodation, and has to allow gays (or anyone, for that matter) to rent the facilities for weddings.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
I don't think they could force churches to perform the ceremonies. If you're not an LDS Church member you can't even attend a wedding in the Temple in Salt Lake. If you're not Catholic you can't be married in a Catholic Church or be married without going through their counseling. I don't see how performing or not performing a gay marriage would be any different than the restrictions on a hetro one.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.