![]() |
Quote:
|
My eyes went crossed for a second. I went over to MP to look through a thread where I posted a Letter to the Editor that I wrote. I went through a loooong thread about SSM. It made it to 1000 posts without being closed. I thought that was cool. It was civil and intelligent. Anyway, I found what I was looking for.
Flashback-o-rama! :D |
Quote:
Quote:
|
I never said I disagreed with that.
|
Neither did I. We said just the opposite, and all along. It's a canard raised by churches as a fearmongering tactic to protect a friggin' word.
|
If 8 passes (Goddess forbid!) I think we should start a petition to get an initiative on the ballot to change all government sanctioned marriages into Domestic Partnerships in the state of California. Make it law that only churches can call them "marriages". That preserves the religious use of marriages being only one man and one woman; and it makes sure that all couples, be they gay or straight, are treated equally under the law!
(Did that make any sense? I'm sleepy, and I re-wrote it 3 times.) |
If 8 passes it will immediately (the same day) be challenged and enjoined in court. I seem to recall there is a problem with the language that makes it a Constitutional revision, not an amendment, which may not be done through the initiative process.
Ah, found it. That effort seems to be on hold right now but be assured it will be mounted again should the initiative actually pass. |
Quote:
Source I also emailed one of my friends with Equality California. His answer was the same. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.