Well shoot, now it's clear why Bush could say he wouldn't deal directly with Iran. It seems he'd already found a contractor to handle it for him.

....and in other news from your site:http://www.projectcensored.org/top-s...laden-to-9-11/

I can pronounce it....it's the spelling that gets me.

Spelling is easy:

محمود احمدی نژا

Or, as Stephanie Miller would have it, "I'madinnerjacket".

Can't wait for Scott's new book to come out?

Proving that the nut does indeed fall close to the tree you can read a book his father wrote several years ago:

http://www.amazon.com/Blood-Money-Po.../dp/0963784625

Cheap shot, Jeff. And so typical of the Republican tactics that have converted me (and many others) from an independent to a Democrat.

If someone says something that dares shed bad light on Bush and his administration, then he is to be publicly smeared; while a member of the administration who committed treasonous acts, and remains loyal and keeps his mouth shut, has his sentence is commuted.

I'm so glad that dems have never turned to such tactics and that the Clintons, during his administration, never did such things.

Make it right? I'm not arguing that at all. But the whole "this is why I'm a dem now"......very, very hard to take seriously.

And this is from someone who thinks LBJ was probably behind JFK's assassination.

Name someone in Clinton's administration who outed a covert CIA agent, had their involvement covered up by the White House, and got away scott free.

Show me where the Democrats, during the Clinton administration, instituted a smear campaign against critics of Clinton.

Show me any examples abuse of power or treasonous acts, by any member of the Clinton administration, that comes anywhere near the level of abuse and treason being committed by the Bush administration.

President Clinton was far from perfect, but try and compare him to President Bush is ridiculous.