Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Daily Grind (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   The random political thoughts thread (Part Deux) (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=3249)

sleepyjeff 09-11-2008 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 239157)
IMO, attempting to deny someone their right to vote is tantamount to treason.

How do you feel about the whole Alice Palmer affair?

JWBear 09-11-2008 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 239166)
How do you feel about the whole Alice Palmer affair?

What has that to do with denying someone their right to have their vote counted?

sleepyjeff 09-11-2008 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 239168)
What has that to do with denying someone their right to have their vote counted?

Well, if your candidate is not even on the ballot due to some smart lawyering by her oposistion wouldn't you feel somewhat disenfranchised? Obama got everyone but himself kicked off the ballot.......yeah, he wanted every vote to count.........for him.

innerSpaceman 09-11-2008 08:43 PM

I don't know about this Palmer incident, but my general study of Obama's political trajectory leads me to believe he played much dirtier in Illinois politics and has gotten cleaner at the game as he's moved from Senator to presidential candidate.


It's a little simplistic to say, because John McCain hasn't always been Mr. Clean Whistle, but my following of his trajectory is that he ran a fairly clean presidential campaign last time (undone by the dirty tricksters) and is running a fairly dirty one this time around.

So Obama is rising from corrupt campaigning and McCain is descending straight down into it.

I don't consider either an angel, and don't put dirty deeds as president beyond either's reach. But clearly I don't like what McCain is becoming, while I think Obama is improving. That, in itself, is reason to vote for Obama in the contest between them.

Tom 09-11-2008 08:56 PM

I have routinely been given misleading information by those seeking signatures on ballot proposition petitions. I always assumed it was workers paid by the signature doing whatever they could for an extra buck, rather than coordinated misinformation by the campaigns.

scaeagles 09-11-2008 09:06 PM

I believe that every political candidate would eat the other if it meant victory. Those candidates who manage to stay above the fray have surrogates who do the dirty work for them, often times with blessings, sometimes without, and still at other times with a "I don't want to know" type attitude for plausible deniability.

Politics is a brutally dirty game and I don't happen to think one side is any cleaner than the other.

JWBear 09-11-2008 09:21 PM

It's one thing to try and keep your competition off the ballot. It's quite another to try and keep people from voting at all.

sleepyjeff 09-11-2008 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 239190)
It's one thing to try and keep your competition off the ballot. It's quite another to try and keep people from voting at all.

:confused:

CoasterMatt 09-11-2008 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 238900)
I have, however, heard several cspan callers predict such a thing but I suppose that's about as telling as asking a hobo if Thunderbird Wine is any good:D

Anybody knows that any respectable hobo prefers Night Train, or even Boone's Farm to Thunderbird.

sleepyjeff 09-11-2008 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoasterMatt (Post 239205)
Anybody knows that any respectable hobo prefers Night Train, or even Boone's Farm to Thunderbird.

Boones' Farm......I've never heard of it(hope I am not dating myself):D


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.