![]() |
Quote:
Of course, I'm also ruined by having had to attend many really lame parades because my first wife was marching in them. Plus, the "Rose Parade" is a Portland thing that I must insist was stolen by Pasadena 17 years before Portland thought of it. The sneaky bastards. |
Quote:
|
If parades were not television shows, I'd never see them. Macy's, Rose, all of the large events are primarialy television events to me. I've never seen the Macy's Parade in person.
|
I've been lucky to see the 'big' parades in person. That said, it's nothing I have to see in person. For me, going to these types of things (a.k.a. things that are early in the morning and/or require discomfort of any sort) is not so much about the parade, but the company and everything else associated with going.
|
Stephanie Edwards speaks.
Quote:
A bit of fallout: Quote:
|
Quote:
I like public spectacles and large crowd gatherings. |
Quote:
I think the Tournament of Roses Parade and the Grand Floral Parade are good on TV because of the all-floral nature - other ones, not so much. And Mardi Gras parades would (and do) make Horrid television. The floats are quite ugly on TV (and many are in person, too, for that matter) - and the main reason for floats is to hold riders who then throw throws. You don't get any of that on Television. (But please don't make me give up Le Krewe D'Etat parade with potentially ugly floats but biting commentary!) |
Ok, what is the DooDah parade?
|
Quote:
That's my problem with the Rose Parade (either one) on TV. The attraction is that the floats are all organic and yet that doesn't show up well on TV. Many of the floats they could just be painted and you'd hardly know the difference. At least a giant balloon maiming people on the streets of New York has some drama. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.