Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Question for the grammar Nazis (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=5659)

Kevy Baby 04-14-2007 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tref (Post 130758)
My first thought is -- what kind of name is XYZ for a company? Is it short for Examine Your Zipper?

No... that would be EYZ, and I'm not easy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 130932)
Maybe if you stroke the apostrophe, it won't continue to hang there all limp and useless.

Damn, I can't give you mojo for that...

Ghoulish Delight 04-15-2007 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LSPoorEeyorick (Post 130914)
It's pretty standard grammatical practice. Chris' is pronounced "chrises." Powers' is pronounced "powerses." I can't find a single reliable grammar reference source online that promotes use of s's because of pronunciation.

As MBC pointed out, Stunk & White (as well as Modern Language Association, Economist, Purdue's Online Writing Lab) indicate that if the "es" is pronounced, it should be written 's. As for supporting sources, since most major sources actually support using 's as the standard case and using s' as the exception based on pronunciation, I'll site some that support said exception: The Guardian (admittedly a UK source), Emory, American Heritage/Bartlby.

Alex 04-15-2007 11:41 AM

Strunk & White is full of all sorts of crap so I've mostly stopped viewing them as a decent source, but like was said way up above, no matter what position you take on the rules of s-ending possessive nouns you'll probably be able to find some source that agrees with you.

So again, no matter how it is done someone important will think you're doing it wrong. So just pick a method that you're comfortable with and be consistent.

Personally I think the the possessive apostrophe is (and the contraction apostrophe) are unnecessary grammatically so let me be the first to advocate that you make a bold linguo-political statement and just not use them at all.

Not Afraid 04-15-2007 11:47 AM

When I was editing (yes, believe it or not, I was an editor for several city-wide publicatons for many years) we developed our style guide and stuck with it. The use of the possessive apostrophe was our standard. But, as mentioned several times before, there are generally sources that will disagree with any particular style guide. I just went with consistency.

lindyhop 04-15-2007 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 130932)
Maybe if you stroke the apostrophe, it won't continue to hang there all limp and useless.

No...never mind...I'm not touching this either.

Kevy Baby 04-26-2007 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Not Afraid (Post 131069)
When I was editing (yes, believe it or not, I was an editor for several city-wide publications for many years)...

I can't be the only one who was surprised and frightened by this?

Jughead P. Jones 04-26-2007 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gn2Dlnd (Post 130945)
!

?

Kevy Baby 04-27-2007 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jughead P. Jones (Post 133167)
?

.

blueerica 04-27-2007 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 133261)
.

;

Ghoulish Delight 04-27-2007 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueerica (Post 133272)
;

Punctuation


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.