Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Daily Grind (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   All About McCain (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=8362)

scaeagles 08-07-2008 04:37 AM

Hey JW....while I appreciate you haven't been around these boards for all these....um....duscussions, I'm just not going to go down this road again. We've hashed it out oo many times.

And tracilicious, I was chatized for an "ad hominem attack" against Obama, so be careful! The ad hominem police are out no matter how true the statement may be (and yours is true).

innerSpaceman 08-07-2008 06:37 AM

Um, no. Ad hominum is allowed ..... in the wisdom of Roger Rabbit, "as long as it was funny."







reanimated-dead qualifies.

Cadaverous Pallor 08-07-2008 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 230558)
Um, no. Ad hominum is allowed ..... in the wisdom of Roger Rabbit, "as long as it was funny."

Sage advice. *nods heavily*


I glanced through an article in a liberal magazine saying "I still like McCain". All the writer could come up with was "he used to be great." Um, duh.

scaeagles 08-07-2008 07:21 AM

I've never had a high opinion of McCain. What has changed about him that has made those of you who used to like him not like him any longer?

Cadaverous Pallor 08-07-2008 07:28 AM

He's changed his stance on everything he leaned left on in order to appease his conservative captors.

Ghoulish Delight 08-07-2008 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 230495)
And your response to the fact that it WAS illegal to invade because the body that made the rules under which your purporting the US had legal authority specifically did not grant that authority? See the death-penalty analogy.

*tap tap tap* I this thing on?

scaeagles 08-07-2008 08:18 AM

GD, just not worth it to me to go over this stuff anymore.....has been rehashed 100 times. I'm not in the mood to bang my head against the wall right now.

JWBear 08-07-2008 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles (Post 230546)
And tracilicious, I was chatized for an "ad hominem attack" against Obama, so be careful! The ad hominem police are out no matter how true the statement may be (and yours is true).

For the record, I wasn't accusing you of making an ad hominem attack, I was saying that those who call him an elitist (among other things) are.

scaeagles 08-07-2008 09:42 AM

No big....I was attempting to be sarcastic and funny and that probably didn't go through.

sleepyjeff 08-07-2008 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 230574)
He's changed his stance on everything he leaned left on in order to appease his conservative captors.

Could you tell me what those things he's changed his stance on are specifically and if he had not changed his stance on those things would you have voted for him?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.