Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Daily Grind (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   The random political thoughts thread (Part Deux) (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=3249)

Strangler Lewis 02-10-2009 07:15 AM

People make that mistake in our house all the time. Which, I guess, means that anyone can be President.

This being a big country, someone out there is making the joke that the black man still hasn't got used to the fact that he doesn't have to break into the White House to get inside.

Maybe I just did. But someone is making it seriously.

scaeagles 02-13-2009 06:50 AM

I'm getting really tired of being silent.

So much for openness. The dems will not even allow the "stimulus" bill to to be posted online for 48 hours to be read by those who would care to. They don't want the details of the spending to come out because every detail that comes out, well, sucks. They said they would, but now they won't.

Turns out that the tax cuts will result in about $8/week to the average worker! WOW! That's amazing. During the campaign, Michelle Obama was mocking the small size of the Bush stimulus checks as being too small to relaly help.

Obama says the Caterpiller will be able to hire back recently laid off workers if the package passes. Problem is the CEO of Caterpiller said there will be more layoffs even if the so called stimulus passes.

I wish I had more time to keep going. This stimulus bill and the spending in it SUCKS.

OH! And the whole concept of the "fairness doctrine". I know what would be fair - if liberal talk radio could make money, they would have more liberal talk radio on the air. Why don't they try making a profit and see how quickly stations pick up the programming? It is not the place of government to determine what on the airwaves is fair in terms of political speech. It is censorship and there is no other way to describe it.

wendybeth 02-13-2009 09:03 AM

Is this what you were looking for, Scaeagles? (Btw, posted at a lib site- the Huffington Post- and with the request that readers help sift through it to identify potential pork). Stimulus Report

Alex 02-13-2009 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles (Post 268540)
I'm getting really tired of being silent.

So don't be silent.

Quote:

So much for openness. The dems will not even allow the "stimulus" bill to to be posted online for 48 hours to be read by those who would care to. They don't want the details of the spending to come out because every detail that comes out, well, sucks. They said they would, but now they won't.
It should be made available but regardless it doesn't really matter if it is or not since the bill is now beyond the point when it can be changed. 5 days won't particularly matter so I hope Obama does make it available for review before he signs (though I doubt he will).

Quote:

Turns out that the tax cuts will result in about $8/week to the average worker! WOW! That's amazing. During the campaign, Michelle Obama was mocking the small size of the Bush stimulus checks as being too small to relaly help.
A key difference being that unlike the Bush stimulus that amount (I'd been seeing $13/week but I'm sure the number can be sliced in various ways) is not the complete extent of the stimulus.

Quote:

Obama says the Caterpiller will be able to hire back recently laid off workers if the package passes. Problem is the CEO of Caterpiller said there will be more layoffs even if the so called stimulus passes.
That's true, but it misrepresents Caterpillar's CEO as saying that the stimulus package won't help. In fact he said that the government needs to spend even more. All he said was that the stimulus package wouldn't help immediately and that there would likely be more layoffs before things improved.

This is a contradiction of what Obama said, but it appears that Obama may have said what he said because that is what the same CEO told him a couple of days ago (and is now contradicting himself).

Quote:

OH! And the whole concept of the "fairness doctrine".
I agree. The government should not be regulating the airwaves at all. If someone wants to set up transmitters and interfere with the local talk news stations broadcast that should be their right.

Seriously though, I do agree that the fairness doctrine is an anachronism.

SacTown Chronic 02-13-2009 09:30 AM

Rise so high, yet so far to fall
A plan of dignity and balance for all
Political breakthrough, euphoria's high
More borrowed money, more borrowed time
Backed in a corner, caught up in the race
Means to an end ended in disgrace
Perspective is lost in the spirit of the chase



(Megadeth cyber-hug for scaeagles)

scaeagles 02-13-2009 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 268563)
So don't be silent.

It should be made available but regardless it doesn't really matter if it is or not since the bill is now beyond the point when it can be changed.

That's true, but it misrepresents Caterpillar's CEO as saying that the stimulus package won't help. In fact he said that the government needs to spend even more. All he said was that the stimulus package wouldn't help immediately and that there would likely be more layoffs before things improved.


Self imposed silence. Wanted to back off and see what would happen with Obama and the dem congressional control without jumping on everything that I disagreed with.

It does matter. Too much money to violate the calls for transparency.

I think Obama was trying to mislead regarding the Caterpillar stuff. He wanted it to seem as if this bill would make an immediate impact if passed in putting pressure to act immediately.

Moonliner 02-13-2009 10:06 AM

I'm not sure what's worse, the Republicans who always operate in the shadows or the Dem's who promise to work in the light then shoot out the bulb at the last second.

I would like a chance for a public review, the markets are closed over the weekend so I don't think the country would suffer irreparable harm waiting the 48 hours.


I'm keeping an eye on this site: ReadTheStimulus.org

BarTopDancer 02-13-2009 10:08 AM

My unemployment (as well as the unemployment of my co-workers) is an indirect result of Caterpillar's volume dropping. They are our largest client and when they aren't hiring and moving people my [former] company is effected. Also, CAT is a global company, and their volume is not solely dependent on the state of the US economy. When demand drops off throughout the world CAT runs into issues.

I don't think anyone expected an immediate fix to the economy. It took us a long time to get to where we are, it's not going to be fixed overnight.

Alex 02-13-2009 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles (Post 268572)
I think Obama was trying to mislead regarding the Caterpillar stuff. He wanted it to seem as if this bill would make an immediate impact if passed in putting pressure to act immediately.

Unless, as has been suggested (though I don't know the provenance of it) the CEO of Caterpillar had told him that passage of the stimulus would result in them holding off on some of the announced layoffs.

In which case Obama was lead out on the branch and then had it cut off behind him.

If that was not said to him then yes it was misleading.

Stan4dSteph 02-13-2009 11:18 AM

I think Obama got told something and then the CEO decided to go back on what he said.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.