Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   The Breastaurant: Newish Trend (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=9130)

alphabassettgrrl 01-27-2009 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SzczerbiakManiac (Post 265853)
Would you patronize a restaurant, such as Hooters, with a buxom, all female waitstaff?

I'm not trying to determine your position on the Kinsey Scale, I'm just curious if you eschew restaurants with food servers whose primary purpose is to be physically attractive.

It depends on the atmosphere, and how ostentatious the wait staff. Hooters has girls with big boobs, but they're pretty low-key about anything other than just serving food.

It would also depend on the food. I'd probably be less likely to go to a place that's showy about having muscle-bound guys, and more likely to go to a place that has hot girls, but it would come down to the food for anything more than a novelty visit.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby (Post 265866)
I think it appeals to people's desire to be able to oogle women (in the case of Hooters) without the guilt of going to a "strip club": "hey; it's just a restaurant..."

People feel guilty about going to strip clubs? Huh.

Yeah, I don't know that I could pretend I "only" went for the food. But I've been called a perv before, so take that as you will. I don't mind the atmosphere at Hooters; the servers are all around for the looking, and then they bring food, and they don't go far away when they do leave. I don't go to Hooter's often, both because we don't have one here, and because I'm not all that thrilled with the food. Their beer's ok but that's about it. We usually go when we go to Vegas.

Kevy Baby 01-27-2009 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 265910)
See, it's the pretense that bugs me. The idea that someone would feel guilty for visiting a strip club but not feel guilty for pretending they showed up for the buffalo wings just baffles me.

I'm not sure it is intentional pretense or just different levels of acceptability. Everyone has their limit as to where the line gets drawn.

If anything, I give a little props to Hooters for being blatant about it. I have been to many an establishment (I'm talking mainstream restaurants) where it is obvious that one is hired almost entirely based on looks: young cute females.

Alex 01-27-2009 10:18 PM

I pretty much do go just for the food. If the waitstaff were swapped with that found at an IHOP I would go just as often.

You're right, I have the option of seeing naked breasteses any time I want to. Seeing tank-topped ones long ago lost sufficient appeal to get me to pay $40 for dinner just to see them. Their food isn't great but I do like the buffalo shrimp and sometimes I'm just in the mood for bar food or going somewhere I can be sure some game will be on in the background.

And as Kevy says it is common anyway. We have friends in Santa Rosa that host a couple overnight parties a year. The standard morning after breakfast place is fondly referred to as "boobie breakfast" (by both the men and women in our group who go) because of the staff (they aren't dressed skimpilly though); but if the food were worse we wouldn't go.

Morrigoon 01-28-2009 12:20 AM

I've eaten at Hooters several times. I like the wings.

Strangler Lewis 01-28-2009 06:19 AM

In the '70s, my father took the family to dinner a few times at the Playboy Club in Manhattan. I don't remember if the food was good or not. The waitresses wore high and low cut one piece affairs, ears and a tail. I grabbed some fluffy tail, which made everyone laugh.

Some years later, but not many, my dad told me, a propos of what I don't recall, that the genius of the Playboy Club was that the waitresses were trained only to flirt with the gentlemen customers but never to take them up on their offers so that the men would not have the pressure of performing. Good talk, dad.

3894 01-28-2009 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor (Post 265856)
I'm of the (completely subjective and totally minority) opinion that this whole concept is dumb at best and creepy at worst.

A neighboring town has a new breastaurant. My kids have been telling me that this and that person they went to school with works there.

Then I saw a photo of the waitstaff in the local paper. I look at those servers in their plaid pushup bras and low-rise mini kilts and I see second-graders from back in the day.

Ew.

Moonliner 01-28-2009 08:03 AM

I took my wife (new girlfriend at the time) to Hooters once.

It was the new restaurant on the block and it had this cute little Hoot Owl for a logo. I never made the connection as to the other meaning "hooters" can have. Well at least not until we were seated anyways.... :blush:

Cadaverous Pallor 01-28-2009 08:52 AM

Heehee, Helen. It's kind of wrong when they grow up.

Moonliner - yeah, the logo is a bit innocent looking. Perhaps it needs to be a large breasted owl...

Ghoulish Delight 01-28-2009 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strangler Lewis (Post 265956)
Some years later, but not many, my dad told me, a propos of what I don't recall, that the genius of the Playboy Club was that the waitresses were trained only to flirt with the gentlemen customers but never to take them up on their offers so that the men would not have the pressure of performing.

So that's the line the Bunny gave him when he made a pass, eh?

Mousey Girl 01-28-2009 02:20 PM

Bakersfield now has a Tilted Kilt and plans for Hooters. Of course, being Bakersfield, there has already been quite a bit of trouble with patrons at Tilted Kilt.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.