Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Beatnik (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Reboot yuckiness: Buffy the Vampire Slayer (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=9548)

Ghoulish Delight 05-27-2009 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gn2Dlnd (Post 284944)
What word were the comix geeks using before "reboot?" I dislike using the term.

Pandering.

Andrew 05-27-2009 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonliner (Post 284940)
Could someone please reboot the Chronicles of Narnia. That franchise is in desperate need of a reboot.

I'd be happy if the (movie) series was just continued instead of being abandoned after Prince Caspian.

Ghoulish Delight 05-27-2009 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonliner (Post 284945)
So perhaps what really sets a reboot apart is that it breaks with existing canon. A fresh start that may or may not be at the beginning of the overall story.

True, it doesn't have to start at the beginning. But there does have to be something that explicitly identifies it as breaking from canon. So even though Batman Returns and Batman Forever don't tie into Burton's Batmans, there was nothing in them that explicitly conveys a novel new direction with the intent of separating these new movies from what came before. If anything they were purposely (if misguidedly) trying to tie it back to the campiness of the 60s series.

Hmm, perhaps Singer's Superman is better described as "restore from last known good" than "reboot".

flippyshark 05-27-2009 01:43 PM

Well, reboot isn't quite as desperate sounding as the (now seemingly passe) "reimagining." (I'm looking at you, Planet of the Apes)

Cadaverous Pallor 05-27-2009 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 284970)
So even though Batman Returns and Batman Forever don't tie into Burton's Batmans, there was nothing in them that explicitly conveys a novel new direction with the intent of separating these new movies from what came before.

Ok, you said it twice, so I have to ask. Batman Returns is the Burton sequel featuring Michelle Pfeiffer. Batman Forever is the first Schumacher sequel, with Val Kilmer at the Bat.

I'm not sure if you meant to reference the two Schumacher sequels (Batman Forever and Batman and Robin) or the two Nolan films (Batman Begins and Dark Knight).

Ghoulish Delight 05-27-2009 03:50 PM

Grrr, yes. I meant Batman Forever and Batman and Robin.

I blame the DayQuil.

lashbear 05-27-2009 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight (Post 284980)
I blame the DayQuil.

I blame it on the sunshine.

Morrigoon 06-17-2009 11:57 PM

Foamy cartoon about rebooting

Tref 06-21-2009 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lashbear (Post 285012)
I blame it on the sunshine.

I blame it on Rio. But then I blame everything on Rio, except, ironically, that terrible film, Blame it on Rio, which I blame on Larry Gelbart.

Anyhoo, I just watched the original Buffy on TV last week and was it bad. Even Paul Ruebens was given nothing to do. What a waste. I remember my friend Janna was always trying to get me interested in the series but I only saw one episode -- in it, smiling, floating, ghouls, take away your voice and then torture you -- pretty chilling!

Tref sez, check it out.

LSPoorEeyorick 06-21-2009 04:28 PM

I think that the series is far better than the film. The screenwriter of the film was not satisfied with the way his screenplay was produced, so he re-produced it himself as a series. It took me awhile to really get into it, but once I did, I was branded for life as a fan. That episode you saw, Tref, is one of my favorites.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.