Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Daily Grind (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   All About McCain (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=8362)

sleepyjeff 09-03-2008 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Morrigoon (Post 237084)
His tax policy is not why I prefer him over the other candidate. Just like someone could prefer McCain even if he doesn't support gay marriage. It takes more than one issue to make a candidate. You have to pick and choose which aspects of a candidate's position are most important to you, or which candidate falls more in line with your position than the other.

You could also call it the "two turds in the bowl" approach, although this year's crop are better candidates than we've been offered in the past.

I didn't mean you specifically......but others here have pointed to his tax cuts as a good reason to vote for him over McCain; if they hope those cuts never go into effect than are they not participating in false advertising?

JWBear 09-03-2008 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 237048)
Which Republican politician had a "little indiscrection" here.....I thought we were talking about a 17 year old girl who has never run for elected office?

I was speaking in general terms.

JWBear 09-03-2008 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff (Post 237083)
But how is that 'hypocrisy"?

Perhaps not, but it is damned ironic!

innerSpaceman 09-03-2008 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scaeagles (Post 237082)
I realize that, ISM. Would it not follow, though, that her family would move to DC with her, making her much closer to her children than Biden was to his? And also there is another parent involved?

I don't see how that is stupid at all.

Well, to be frank, I find it silly to argue she's unattentive to her kids because her hubby didn't do her bidding by quitting his job or because she only took a 3-day maternity leave ... so I guess you and I agree these are non-issues. I just took issue with your particular counter-example because it was ill-chosen.

sleepyjeff 09-03-2008 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWBear (Post 237088)
Perhaps not, but it is damned ironic!

That it is:)

scaeagles 09-03-2008 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman (Post 237090)
so I guess you and I agree these are non-issues.

Indeed.

Tenigma 09-03-2008 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strangler Lewis (Post 237012)
I can't help but think that if the Democrats nominated a black woman to be vice president and it turned out her teen daughter was pregnant and the boyfriend was quoted saying the kind of macho things one would expect a black teen to say that there would not be this outpouring of sentiment from the conservative family values crowd.

Try again:
Quote:

If the Obamas had a 17 year-old daughter who was unmarried and pregnant by a tough-talking black kid, my guess is if that they all appeared onstage at a Democratic convention and the delegates were cheering wildly, a number of conservatives might be discussing the issue of dysfunctional black families.
And THAT is from an editorial at National Review.

Tenigma 09-03-2008 01:05 PM

Lani's final straw: Palin tried to get books banned at the Wasila Public Library when she was mayor. When the librarian refused, Palin tried to get the librarian fired. That didn't work... right away. The librarian was eventually pressured out of her job.

You want the country run by someone like that? She's going to make Bush look like a pansy.

Morrigoon 09-03-2008 02:02 PM

Holy cow, she's like Bush with brains!

(err... the joke is there, it's obvious, I don't need to make it, do I?)

lashbear 09-03-2008 03:32 PM

*Pops in*
Nope, no Alex here...
*Pops out*


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.