Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Lounge Lizard (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Soooo.... (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=136)

lashbear 11-29-2006 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight
Comes with its own ear.

vBulletin Message
You must spread some Mojo around before giving it to Ghoulish Delight again.


:snap:

LSPoorEeyorick 11-29-2006 09:32 PM

OK, that is enough, Lindsay and Britney.

I don't think I've unintentionally flashed my hoo-ha at any point in my life.

How is it possible that one star has flashed hers twice and another has flashed it three times in the last month? There's no way it's unintentional. Somebody get these girls some professional psychological help. And some panties.

And, perezhilton, stop showing it to me. One of them was very graphic. And it's like a car accident. I CANNOT look away from that. Damn you!

Bornieo: Fully Loaded 11-29-2006 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LSPoorEeyorick
OK, that is enough, Lindsay and Britney.

I don't think I've unintentionally flashed my hoo-ha at any point in my life.!


OH I saw the latest Britney one. Eh, nothing really to see. The pack of cigaretts on the floorboard had more exposure. :rolleyes:

Prudence 11-29-2006 11:34 PM

And I'll bet you dollars to donuts these "ladies" think their tushies are too pwecious to sit on toilet seats and that they hover and spray lest they catch cooties - and then go plop their bare bottoms on taxi seats and other much more cootie-likely surfaces.

LSPoorEeyorick 11-30-2006 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bornieo: Fully Loaded
OH I saw the latest Britney one. Eh, nothing really to see. The pack of cigaretts on the floorboard had more exposure. :rolleyes:

It's the second Britney one that's more disturbing. WAAAY more disturbing.

Bornieo: Fully Loaded 11-30-2006 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LSPoorEeyorick
It's the second Britney one that's more disturbing. WAAAY more disturbing.

Cool. I'll have to find that.

Kevy? :rolleyes:

lashbear 11-30-2006 12:21 PM


Kevy Baby 11-30-2006 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lashbear
I might need to check peoples sigs more closely in future ! :cool:

And has since been replaced. Sometimes, it is just too easy.

Kevy Baby 11-30-2006 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LSPoorEeyorick
It's the second Britney one that's more disturbing. WAAAY more disturbing.

This is the second (that I found):

(The Official "Duh" notice: Not Safe For Work)

Spoiler:
It's a photograph of a woman's private area - are you sure you wanna look?
Spoiler:



Not nearly as bad as the First One <-- Again, not safe for work, but I think you can guess that by the subject matter (or at least I hope you can).

But neither of these shots is all that bad (especially the second one [strangely listed first]). Since when did a woman's vagina (not counting the diseased ones) become "icky"? I don't get that. Granted, it would seem from the second one that she hasn't shaved in few days (if you're gonna go bald, don't shave: wax). But heck people - it's just the human body.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bornieo: Fully Loaded
Cool. I'll have to find that.

Kevy? :rolleyes:

Am I the ONLY person who knows how to find pictures of naked women on the internet? It ain't that hard to do!

Not Afraid 11-30-2006 10:16 PM

WHY AM I WASTING MY LIMITED BANDWIDTH TRYING TO VIEW PICTURES OF FAMOUS HOO-HA'S?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.