Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Daily Grind (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   The random political thoughts thread (Part Deux) (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=3249)

Alex 05-29-2010 04:44 PM

To the extent I have a problem with the offer it is not on the election side of the equation. Hell, I don't have a problem with it if you can convince someone not to run by writing them a check for $1 million and offering the sexual services of your wife for the weekend.

If there's an issue is on the job side where presumably we'd like there to be some balance between political considerations in awarding it and actual qualifications. That said, in this case, if the job under consideration was Secretary of the Navy, offering it to a retired admiral doesn't seem a horrible lapse in propriety.

But political jobs will be doled for political reasons (Hillary Clinton was not given Secretary of State because she was considered the best person for the job) and if we don't like it then cabinet positions should be put under the civil service umbrella. If what was done is technically illegal then I'd argue it is a flawed law and an example of the criminalization of politics that I often hear Republicans talking about. But still, if a technical violation did occur I'd rather it just be admitted and move on than play the Bush game of "it didn't happen, if it did it wasn't illegal, and if it was illegal well we'll wait until the news cycle moves on before admitting it." Of course, another big issue is that with the hypercynicism of current politics it is impossible to simply say "oops" without the consequences being outsized to the mistake.

BarTopDancer 05-29-2010 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 324656)
But political jobs will be doled for political reasons (Hillary Clinton was not given Secretary of State because she was considered the best person for the job)

This is a huge problem. We should have the best of the best in positions of power. Not the person on the end of the "if you do [thing that will benefit the party] we'll reward you with [high power position]" offer.

Alex 05-29-2010 05:01 PM

But when it comes to political positions, "best of the best" is often a meaningless idea, one with no objective definition.

Ghoulish Delight 05-29-2010 06:12 PM

Yeah, the skillset is nebulous at best for many of the positions. As long as they aren't grossly underqualified, I don't consider political considerations an invalid deciding factor between the many many perfectly qualified candidates.

JWBear 06-01-2010 10:08 AM

Just read this online. It's perfect!

Quote:

(The Conservative Christian Right) use the Bible like a drunk uses a lamp post, for support rather than for illumination.

Alex 06-01-2010 01:56 PM

Politician accused of being reasonably educated person issues vociferous denial.

JWBear 06-01-2010 02:56 PM

Alabama. Why am I not suprised?

Tref 06-02-2010 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex (Post 324659)
But when it comes to political positions, "best of the best" is often a meaningless idea, one with no objective definition.

Tell that to Eric Roberts.

(Pic related - it's Eric Roberts)

Ghoulish Delight 06-04-2010 09:24 AM


BarTopDancer 06-04-2010 09:34 AM

Tetris/SMB crossover fail.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.