Lounge of Tomorrow

Lounge of Tomorrow (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/index.php)
-   Hep Cat and Kitten (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Trends we admire, Trends we dispise (http://74.208.121.111/LoT/showthread.php?t=1843)

lindyhop 08-28-2005 04:43 PM

Today I saw a "baby on board" style sign in the back window of a minivan. Or since this is 2005, maybe it was an SUV. This one was personalized so I now know that Annaliese was on board. Thanks for sharing, parents, do I need to know that?

Prudence 08-28-2005 04:54 PM

So, I know that boots were in last year. But somehow this year they've morphed into 80s granny boots. What the heck? Will lacy anklets be next?

Kevy Baby 08-28-2005 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prudence
So, I know that boots were in last year. But somehow this year they've morphed into 80s granny boots. What the heck? Will lacy anklets be next?

Oh... I hope so!

wendybeth 08-28-2005 11:12 PM

KB- don't the lacy anklets clash with your Dockers?;):p

Kevy Baby 08-28-2005 11:55 PM

No, but it does cause problems with my shorty socks with the little fuzzy ball on the back.

Mousey Girl 08-29-2005 04:14 AM

I am tired of seeing young men/boys with the crotch of their jeans down around their knees. I just want to stop and pull those pants up! The least they can do is cover up their undies. I also get tired of the little girls dressing like they just stepped out of Build-a-Whore. Do little girls need to be dressing in such skimpy clothing? Trying to find not slutified clothes for my neices is next to impossible.

Kevy Baby 08-29-2005 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mousey Girl
I also get tired of the little girls dressing like they just stepped out of Build-a-Whore. Do little girls need to be dressing in such skimpy clothing?

If they are over 18, it is required. Under 18 and it is bad.

Mousey Girl 08-29-2005 04:37 PM

tsk tsk KB, they are 10 and 7.

Kevy Baby 08-30-2005 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mousey Girl
tsk tsk KB, they are 10 and 7.

I was speaking "in general" (sorta like the "General You"). I assure you that I do not lust after anybody under 18. And 7 & 10? That would be just sick (and that's saying a lot coming from me!).

Not Afraid 08-30-2005 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby
I was speaking "in general" (sorta like the "General You"). I assure you that I do not lust after anybody under 18. And 7 & 10? That would be just sick (and that's saying a lot coming from me!).

I read this then looked at your avatar.

Cracked me up!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.