Well, considering you bad mojo-ed me for saying Hello Kitty wasn't swanky, I'm not surprised you would be tempted.

I never forget when I've been wronged, CP.:p

Me too! Way to ruin a board experiment! :mad: :p

I have not ruined your experiment! To the contrary, in fact.

Your experiment, I presume, was to see if it is possible to keep a high post/view ratio. On the internet, you have rabble rousers like me, and you must take that into account in your data. So I am actually SAVING your experiment, and therefore, you should give me GOOD mojo.

If you must assign blame, tracilisious, you must assign it to wendybeth. At the time I read her posting, I had not concocted my scheme of not posting. Being accused falsely led me down the path rabble-rousing.

I felt like an outcast. Like someone not to be trusted. Yes....it was wendybeth who forced me fulfill my destiny and NOT post.

Well, you are a republican. What did you expect?

;)

Way to match people's expectations, babe. :rolleyes:

I take that comment to mean that I've crossed some sort of line with posters here on this board - not CP in particular, but many, based on the word "people's". Have I established some sort of poor reputation here?

I was just messing around. If I've annoyed people here by being silly, I'll gladly pay penance of posting 1000 consecutive times in the "you must post" thread to raise the ratio.

Psst, I think she was continuing the facetious tone of this thread.

Just to be clear - I told scaeagles privately that I'm not ecstatic about him undermining the other thread.

No biggie though, it's just a silly thread. :) It does not change his reputation in my book. Insert joke here. :evil: